These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

91 related items for PubMed ID: 8653919

  • 1. Keeping up with new technology: new approaches to diagnosis of Chlamydia infection.
    LeBar WD.
    Clin Chem; 1996 May; 42(5):809-12. PubMed ID: 8653919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections--2002.
    Johnson RE, Newhall WJ, Papp JR, Knapp JS, Black CM, Gift TL, Steece R, Markowitz LE, Devine OJ, Walsh CM, Wang S, Gunter DC, Irwin KL, DeLisle S, Berman SM.
    MMWR Recomm Rep; 2002 Oct 18; 51(RR-15):1-38; quiz CE1-4. PubMed ID: 12418541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection by use of DNA amplification.
    Ostergaard L.
    APMIS Suppl; 1999 Oct 18; 89():5-36. PubMed ID: 10189834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detection of C trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction.
    Näher H, Drzonek H, Wolf J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Petzoldt D.
    Genitourin Med; 1991 Jun 18; 67(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 2071122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a pregnancy counseling clinic.
    Binns B, Williams T, McDowell J, Brunham RC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov 18; 159(5):1144-9. PubMed ID: 3056001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of strand displacement and ligase chain amplification for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urogenital specimens.
    Zeeberg B, Miörner H, Thelin I, Agren S, Schalén C.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Sep 18; 11(9):761-4. PubMed ID: 16104993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of diagnostic methods in adolescent girls with and without symptoms of Chlamydia urogenital infection.
    Biro FM, Reising SF, Doughman JA, Kollar LM, Rosenthal SL.
    Pediatrics; 1994 Mar 18; 93(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 8115208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of an automated extraction method for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Cobas Amplicor PCR from different sample materials.
    Geertsen R, Friderich P, Dobec M, Emler S.
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2007 Mar 18; 39(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 17464862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens.
    de Barbeyrac B, Rodriguez P, Dutilh B, Le Roux P, Bébéar C.
    Genitourin Med; 1995 Dec 18; 71(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 8566978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Diagnosis of urogenital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis. Contribution of genetic amplification techniques].
    Hamdad F, Orfila J.
    Prog Urol; 2005 Sep 18; 15(4):598-601. PubMed ID: 16459669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.