These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


122 related items for PubMed ID: 8659426

  • 1. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
    Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Ducic I, Tefft MC, Olson MC, Cooper C, Zeman RK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement.
    Silverman PM, Roberts S, Tefft MC, Brown B, Fox SH, Cooper C, Zeman RK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7785637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?
    Frederick MG, McElaney BL, Singer A, Park KS, Paulson EK, McGee SG, Nelson RC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Tsurusaki M, Sugimoto K, Fujii M, Sugimura K.
    Radiat Med; 2004 Jun; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT.
    Ruess L, Bulas DI, Kushner DC, Silverman PM, Fearon TC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
    Schweiger GD, Chang PJ, Brown BP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of tailored and empiric scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen.
    Sheiman RG, Raptopoulos V, Caruso P, Vrachliotis T, Pearlman J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):725-9. PubMed ID: 8751690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL, Parisky YR, Bernardino ME, Costello P, Leder R, Brown PC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC.
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.