These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 8666737

  • 1. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
    Arch RR.
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA.
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
    Cherry AL.
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A.
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reply to Sarah Burns.
    Colker R.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990 May; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner.
    Garfield H.
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Jackson: a recurring dilemma for health care providers in the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.
    Bamberger DH.
    MD Law Rev; 1987 Apr; 46(3):514-32. PubMed ID: 11649934
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
    Sterns ML.
    New Engl Law Rev; 1987 Apr; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J, Miller A.
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994 Apr; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In re E.G., a Minor: death over life: a judicial trend continues as the Illinois Supreme Court grants minors the right to refuse life-saving medical treatment.
    Brewster WD.
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 16622959
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The politics of abortion.
    Gearty C.
    J Law Soc; 1992 Apr; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. When is a woman's body not her own? According to law, when she's pregnant.
    Scutt JA.
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992 Apr; 5(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11651332
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties.
    Solomon RI.
    Am J Law Med; 1991 Apr; 17(4):411-34. PubMed ID: 1812768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Death, ethics and the state.
    Kalt BC.
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000 Apr; 23(2):487-550. PubMed ID: 12452157
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
    Bower HR.
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001 Apr; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.