These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
129 related items for PubMed ID: 8674687
21. X-SITE: use of empirically derived atomic packing preferences to identify favourable interaction regions in the binding sites of proteins. Laskowski RA, Thornton JM, Humblet C, Singh J. J Mol Biol; 1996 May 31; 259(1):175-201. PubMed ID: 8648645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Improving homology models for protein-ligand binding sites. Kauffman C, Rangwala H, Karypis G. Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2008 May 31; 7():211-22. PubMed ID: 19642282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Structural model and ligand interactions of the Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri oligopeptide-binding protein. Moutran A, Balan A, Ferreira LC, Giorgetti A, Tramontano A, Ferreira RC. Genet Mol Res; 2007 Dec 11; 6(4):1169-77. PubMed ID: 18273810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Protein-Ligand Interactions by Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation: A Case of Oligopeptide Binding Protein. Fu Y, Zhao J, Chen Z. Comput Math Methods Med; 2018 Dec 11; 2018():3502514. PubMed ID: 30627209 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Beyond structural genomics: computational approaches for the identification of ligand binding sites in protein structures. Ghersi D, Sanchez R. J Struct Funct Genomics; 2011 Jul 11; 12(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 21537951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The architecture of protein-ligand binding sites revealed through template-assisted intramolecular peptide-peptide interactions. Yu C, Malesevic M, Jahreis G, Schutkowski M, Fischer G, Schiene-Fischer C. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2005 Feb 18; 44(9):1408-12. PubMed ID: 15666425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Specificity of trypsin and chymotrypsin: loop-motion-controlled dynamic correlation as a determinant. Ma W, Tang C, Lai L. Biophys J; 2005 Aug 18; 89(2):1183-93. PubMed ID: 15923233 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Attempts to convert chymotrypsin to trypsin. Venekei I, Szilágyi L, Gráf L, Rutter WJ. FEBS Lett; 1996 Jan 29; 379(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 8635580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Stochastic roadmap simulation for the study of ligand-protein interactions. Apaydin MS, Guestrin CE, Varma C, Brutlag DL, Latombe JC. Bioinformatics; 2002 Jan 29; 18 Suppl 2():S18-26. PubMed ID: 12385979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. EmPLiCS: an empirical approach for structure-based design of natural peptide drugs. Ishida H, Shirai T, Matsuda Y, Kato Y, Ohno M, Isaji T, Yamane T. J Biochem; 2000 Oct 29; 128(4):561-74. PubMed ID: 11011138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of amino acid side chain mutations in conformational design of peptides and proteins. Laufer B, Frank AO, Chatterjee J, Neubauer T, Mas-Moruno C, Kummerlöwe G, Kessler H. Chemistry; 2010 May 10; 16(18):5385-90. PubMed ID: 20358563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. Claussen H, Buning C, Rarey M, Lengauer T. J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr 27; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Essential motions and energetic contributions of individual residues in a peptide bound to an SH3 domain. Kolafa J, Perram JW, Bywater RP. Biophys J; 2000 Aug 27; 79(2):646-55. PubMed ID: 10919999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking. Brewerton SC. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May 27; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]