These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 8678342

  • 21. Prospective study of posttreatment changes in the temporomandibular joint.
    Carlton KL, Nanda RS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 12439476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Improved Visualization and Assessment of Condylar Position in the Glenoid Fossa for Different Occlusions: A CBCT Study.
    Kaur A, Natt AS, Mehra SK, Maheshwari K, Singh G, Kaur A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug 01; 17(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 27659088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The functional shift of the mandible in unilateral posterior crossbite and the adaptation of the temporomandibular joints: a pilot study.
    Nerder PH, Bakke M, Solow B.
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr 01; 21(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 10327739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Three-dimensional positional assessment of glenoid fossae and mandibular condyles in patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion.
    de Mattos JM, Palomo JM, de Oliveira Ruellas AC, Cheib PL, Eliliwi M, Souki BQ.
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Nov 01; 87(6):847-854. PubMed ID: 28862492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. An analytic method for evaluating condylar position in the TMJ and its application to orthodontic patients with painful clicking.
    Sakuda M, Tanne K, Tanaka E, Takasugi H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jan 01; 101(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 1731494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Relationships of condylar path angle with malocclusion and temporomandibular joint disturbances.
    Motoyoshi M, Inoue K, Kiuchi K, Ohya M, Nakajima A, Aramoto T, Namura S.
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1993 Mar 01; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8326372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Comparison of skeletal structure of temporomandibular joint through cone-beam CT between Angle ClassⅠ, Ⅱ1, Ⅱ2, Ⅲ malocclusion patients with permanent dentition].
    Song JY, Qian LW, Cheng MJ, Qian YF.
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 1993 Mar 01; 28(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 31384898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Relationship between condylar position, dentofacial deformity and temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an MRI and CT prospective study.
    Fernández Sanromán J, Gómez González JM, del Hoyo JA.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb 01; 26(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 9563593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after orthognathic surgery.
    Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE.
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Feb 01; 14(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 1563472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Condyle fossa relationship associated with functional posterior crossbite, before and after rapid maxillary expansion.
    Leonardi R, Caltabiano M, Cavallini C, Sicurezza E, Barbato E, Spampinato C, Giordano D.
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov 01; 82(6):1040-6. PubMed ID: 22519882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Centric slide in different Angle's classes of occlusion.
    Čimić S, Badel T, Šimunković SK, Pavičin IS, Ćatić A.
    Ann Anat; 2016 Jan 01; 203():47-51. PubMed ID: 26434757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Condylar volume and condylar area in class I, class II and class III young adult subjects.
    Saccucci M, D'Attilio M, Rodolfino D, Festa F, Polimeni A, Tecco S.
    Head Face Med; 2012 Dec 14; 8():34. PubMed ID: 23241136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. 2D-3D comparison of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class II versus Class I adults: A retrospective study.
    García-Díaz R, Arriola-Guillén LE, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Agudelo-Botero AM, Fiori-Chincaro GA.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec 14; 18(4):784-793. PubMed ID: 32513609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of mandibular trabecular bone structure in growing children with Class I, II, and III malocclusions using fractal analysis: A retrospective study.
    Tercanlı H, Bolat Gümüş E.
    Int Orthod; 2024 Sep 14; 22(3):100875. PubMed ID: 38692119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Osseous changes of the mandibular condyle affect backward-rotation of the mandibular ramus in Angle Class II orthodontic patients with idiopathic condylar resorption of the temporomandibular joint.
    Kajii TS, Fujita T, Sakaguchi Y, Shimada K.
    Cranio; 2019 Jul 14; 37(4):264-271. PubMed ID: 29359644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients.
    Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Zepa K.
    Stomatologija; 2009 Jul 14; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 19423969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Correlations between condylar characteristics and facial morphology in Class II preadolescent patients.
    Burke G, Major P, Glover K, Prasad N.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Sep 14; 114(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9743139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comprehensive positional and morphological assessments of the temporomandibular joint in adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a retrospective CBCT study.
    Chen Y, Li L, Li Y, Luo N, Dai H, Zhou J.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb 07; 23(1):78. PubMed ID: 36750919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.