These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


627 related items for PubMed ID: 8714069

  • 1. [Incidence and indication for cesarean section at the Central Military Hospital of Mexico].
    Olivares Morales AS, Santiago Ramirez JA, Cortes Ramirez P.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1996 Feb; 64():79-84. PubMed ID: 8714069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
    Mesleh RA, Asiri F, Al-Naim MF.
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM, Meri ZB.
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003 Nov; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E.
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.
    Baskett TF, McMillen RM.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct 01; 125(7):723-6. PubMed ID: 7326654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Is the high frequency of Caesarean sections in a highly specialized gyneco-obstetric hospital justifiable?].
    Guzmán Ibarra Mde L, Ablanedo Aguirre J, Basavilvazo Rodríguez MA, Martínez Rodríguez OA, Ahumada Ramírez E.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Jun 01; 71():291-6. PubMed ID: 14515659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Self-evaluation of obstetricians by delivery data to reduce cesarean section rate in Chai Nat Hospital.
    Kunthonkitidej K, Ngernset O.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Nov 01; 84(11):1587-93. PubMed ID: 11853302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Is a cesarean section rate of less than 12% possible in a tertiary level hospital center?].
    Blouin D.
    Union Med Can; 1992 Nov 01; 121(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 1570665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
    Leeman L, Leeman R.
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb 01; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Maternal complications of cesarean section: retrospective analysis of 3,231 interventions at the Casablanca University Hospital, Morocco].
    Abbassi H, Aboulfalah A, Morsad F, Matar N, Himmi A, Mansouri AE.
    Sante; 2000 Feb 01; 10(6):419-23. PubMed ID: 11226939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Frequency of, indications for and clinical epidemiological characteristics of first time cesarean section, compared with repeated cesarean section.
    Trujillo-Hernández B, Rios-Silva M, Huerta M, Trujillo X, Vásquez C, Millán-Guerrero R.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Nov 01; 267(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 12410370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Can the rate of cesarean section be reduced?
    Mesleh RA, Kurdi AM, Ayoub HS.
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Nov 01; 21(11):1054-8. PubMed ID: 11360068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.