These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

191 related items for PubMed ID: 8725417

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Thomson IR, Harding G, Hudson RJ.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2000 Dec; 14(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 11139103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of isoflurane and midazolam as hypnotic supplementation to moderately high-dose fentanyl during coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on systemic hemodynamics and early postoperative recovery profile.
    Driessen JJ, Giart M.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1997 Oct; 11(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 9327316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Sufentanil-midazolam anesthesia for coronary artery surgery.
    Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, el-Ganzouri AR, Spiess BD, Ivankovich AD.
    J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Jun; 4(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 1983403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Concentration-response relationships for fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Thomson IR, Henderson BT, Singh K, Hudson RJ.
    Anesthesiology; 1998 Oct; 89(4):852-61. PubMed ID: 9778002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of two different anesthesia regimens in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting surgery: sufentanil-midazolam versus remifentanil-propofol.
    Lehmann A, Zeitler C, Thaler E, Isgro F, Boldt J.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2000 Aug; 14(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 10972607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Propofol and sufentanil titration with the bispectral index to provide anesthesia for coronary artery surgery.
    Forestier F, Hirschi M, Rouget P, Rigal JC, Videcoq M, Girardet P, Durand M, Maitrasse B, Girard C, Lehot JJ, Du Grés B, Sellin M, Depoix JP, Janvier G, Longrois D.
    Anesthesiology; 2003 Aug; 99(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 12883406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of aortic root infusion of sufentanil on ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement.
    Zuo Y, Cheng X, Gu E, Liu X, Zhang L, Cao Y.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1474-8. PubMed ID: 25312265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Nifedipine versus nitroglycerin in aortocoronary bypass surgery. The effect on hemodynamics, kidney function and homologous blood requirement].
    Petry A, Wulf H, Blömer U, Wawersik J.
    Anaesthesist; 1992 Jan; 41(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 1536439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol, gamma-hydroxybutyrate or midazolam in combination with sufentanil for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Kleinschmidt S, Grundmann U, Janneck U, Kreienmeyer J, Kulosa R, Larsen R.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1997 Nov; 14(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 9466094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.