These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 8735151

  • 1. Aging effects on auditory processing: an event-related potential study.
    Pekkonen E, Rinne T, Reinikainen K, Kujala T, Alho K, Näätänen R.
    Exp Aging Res; 1996; 22(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 8735151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ, Cao KL, Wei CG, Liu YZ.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec 05; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug 05; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Mismatch negativity (MMN) to very short interval between regular tones].
    Jiang DM, Paavilainen P, Lavikainen J, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R.
    Sheng Li Xue Bao; 1994 Dec 17; 46(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 7878484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y, Huang X, Luo Y, Peng C, Liu C.
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr 14; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes.
    Schröger E.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov 14; 100(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 8980416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N, Alho K, Korzyukov O, Carlson S, Martinkauppi S, Escera C, Rinne T, Aronen HJ, Näätänen R.
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul 14; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change.
    Horváth J, Winkler I.
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep 23; 368(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 15351440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings.
    Alho K, Winkler I, Escera C, Huotilainen M, Virtanen J, Jääskeläinen IP, Pekkonen E, Ilmoniemi RJ.
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Mar 23; 35(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 9529947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Auditory stimulus discrimination recorded in dogs, as indicated by mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Howell TJ, Conduit R, Toukhsati S, Bennett P.
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jan 23; 89(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 22001730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory sensory memory and the aging brain: A mismatch negativity study.
    Cooper RJ, Todd J, McGill K, Michie PT.
    Neurobiol Aging; 2006 May 23; 27(5):752-62. PubMed ID: 15908049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J, Myers R, Pirillo R, Drysdale K.
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan 15; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparative study of mismatch negativity (MMN) in epilepsy and non-epileptic seizures.
    Gene-Cos N, Pottinger R, Barrett G, Trimble MR, Ring HA.
    Epileptic Disord; 2005 Dec 15; 7(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 16338681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep 15; 116(9):2142-52. PubMed ID: 16029961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Automatic detection of frequency change is invariant over a large intensity range.
    Schröger E.
    Neuroreport; 1994 Mar 21; 5(7):825-8. PubMed ID: 8018858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The temporal window of integration in elderly and young adults.
    Horváth J, Czigler I, Winkler I, Teder-Sälejärvi WA.
    Neurobiol Aging; 2007 Jun 21; 28(6):964-75. PubMed ID: 16793177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An alternative baseline measure for calculation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the event-related potential (ERP).
    Starratt GK, Nash AJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Feb 21; 51(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 14962571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Preattentive auditory information processing under exposure to the 902 MHz GSM mobile phone electromagnetic field: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Kwon MS, Kujala T, Huotilainen M, Shestakova A, Näätänen R, Hämäläinen H.
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Apr 21; 30(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 19140136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of perceptual grouping on the mismatch negativity.
    Gaeta H, Friedman D, Ritter W, Cheng J.
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar 21; 38(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 11347876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.