These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 8740507

  • 21. Performance of a reagent strip device for quantitation of the urine albumin: creatinine ratio in a point of care setting.
    Parsons M, Newman DJ, Pugia M, Newall RG, Price CP.
    Clin Nephrol; 1999 Apr; 51(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 10230554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of the iChem® Velocity™ urine chemistry analyzer in a hospital routine laboratory.
    Hoffmann P, Hoffmann C, Ziebig R, Zimmermann M.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Mar; 49(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 21288168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [The second biennial of the External Quality Evaluation Program in Urinalysis (PEECU)].
    Loría A, Mejía M, Granados L, Hernández E.
    Rev Invest Clin; 2002 Mar; 54(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 12183892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evaluation of an automated urinalysis system for testing urine chemistry, microscopy and culture.
    Dimech W, Roney K.
    Pathology; 2002 Apr; 34(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12009101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Optimizing the u411 automated urinalysis instrument for veterinary use.
    Evans SJM, Sharp JL, Vap LM.
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2020 Mar; 49(1):106-111. PubMed ID: 31958148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Descriptive urological record of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in the wild and limitations associated with using multi-reagent dipstick test strips.
    Kaur T, Huffman MA.
    J Med Primatol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 15271068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method.
    Sutheesophon K, Wiwanitkit V, Boonchalermvichian C, Charuruks N.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85 Suppl 1():S246-52. PubMed ID: 12188419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Emergency department visual urinalysis versus laboratory urinalysis.
    Worrall JC.
    CJEM; 2009 Nov; 11(6):540-3. PubMed ID: 19922714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Analysis of Four Automated Urinalysis Systems Compared to Reference Methods.
    Bartosova K, Kubicek Z, Franekova J, Louzensky G, Lavrikova P, Jabor A.
    Clin Lab; 2016 Nov 01; 62(11):2115-2123. PubMed ID: 28164659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Evaluation of a method for determining the specific gravity of urine with a reagent strip].
    Favre H.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985 Nov 01; 43(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 3896053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Assessment of new urinalysis dipstick.
    Hearne CR, Donnell MG, Fraser CG.
    Clin Chem; 1980 Jan 01; 26(1):170-1. PubMed ID: 7356557
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Performance Evaluation and Comparison of the Fully Automated Urinalysis Analyzers UX-2000 and Cobas 6500.
    Wesarachkitti B, Khejonnit V, Pratumvinit B, Reesukumal K, Meepanya S, Pattanavin C, Wongkrajang P.
    Lab Med; 2016 May 01; 47(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 27069030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Urinalysis by use of multi-test reagent strips: two dipsticks compared.
    Smith BC, Peake MJ, Fraser CG.
    Clin Chem; 1977 Dec 01; 23(12):2337-40. PubMed ID: 923084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of the effect of urine dip vs urine drip on multi-test strip results.
    Boag AM, Breheny C, Handel I, Gow AG.
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2019 Jun 01; 48(2):276-281. PubMed ID: 31187512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Performance of automated urine analyzers using flow cytometric and digital image-based technology in routine urinalysis.
    Kucukgergin C, Ademoglu E, Omer B, Genc S.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019 Nov 01; 79(7):468-474. PubMed ID: 31460810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A preliminary evaluation of the interaction between urine specific gravity and leukocyte esterase results using Bayer Multistix and the Clinitek 500.
    Lyon ME, Ball CL, Lyon AW, Walpole E, Church DL.
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Oct 01; 36(7):579-81. PubMed ID: 14563454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Urine dipstick testing: comparison of results obtained by visual reading and with the Bayer CLINITEK 50.
    Rumley A.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2000 Mar 01; 37 ( Pt 2)():220-1. PubMed ID: 10735368
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Accuracy of dipstick urinalysis as a screening method for detection of glucose, protein, nitrites and blood.
    Zamanzad B.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2009 Mar 01; 15(5):1323-8. PubMed ID: 20214148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Optimal bedside urinalysis for the detection of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy: a study of diagnostic accuracy.
    Waugh JJ, Bell SC, Kilby MD, Blackwell CN, Seed P, Shennan AH, Halligan AW.
    BJOG; 2005 Apr 01; 112(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 15777437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.