These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

239 related items for PubMed ID: 8744721

  • 1. DRB polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting, DQA oligotyping and mixed lymphocyte culture results in related bone marrow donors and recipients.
    Brojer E, Sankowska M, Stańczak JJ, Gronkowska A, Stepień-Sopniewska B, Górski A, Zupańska B.
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1995; 43(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 8744721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identification of unrelated HLA-identical bone marrow donors: RFLP, oligotyping and PCR fingerprinting for HLA class II compared to MLC responses.
    Mazzola G, el-Borai MH, Berrino M, Cornaglia M, Amoroso A.
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1993; 11 Suppl 1():24-7. PubMed ID: 8095414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The incidence of DPB1 differences between serological and mixed lymphocyte culture matched unrelated individuals: implications for selection of bone marrow donors.
    Eiermann TH, Fakler J, Goldmann SF.
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1992 Mar; 9(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 1387332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. HLA-DR and DQ matching by DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism methods and the outcome of mixed lymphocyte reaction tests in unrelated bone marrow donor searches. The IMUST Study.
    Howard MR, Brookes P, Bidwell JL, Bidwell EA, Clay TM, Evans JL, Hows JM, Bradley BA.
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1992 Mar; 9(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 1354994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Selection of unrelated donors for bone marrow transplantation is improved by HLA class II genotyping with oligonucleotide hybridization.
    Tiercy JM, Morel C, Freidel AC, Zwahlen F, Gebuhrer L, Bétuel H, Jeannet M, Mach B.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1991 Aug 15; 88(16):7121-5. PubMed ID: 1908088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Use of solid phase automated sequencing to define HLA disparity between bone marrow donors and recipients.
    Baxter-Lowe LA, Keever C, Dinauer D, Daniels T, Johnson K, Camitta B, Drobyski W, Garbrecht F, Horowitz M, Pietryga D.
    Transplant Proc; 1995 Feb 15; 27(1):1377-8. PubMed ID: 7878917
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A high resolution HLA class I and class II matching method for bone marrow donor selection.
    Argüello JR, Little AM, Bohan E, Gallardo D, O'Shea J, Dodi IA, Goldman JM, Madrigal JA.
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Sep 15; 22(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 9758338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.