These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

815 related items for PubMed ID: 8758816

  • 21. Can hysterolaparoscopic mediated chromopertubation obviate the need for hysterosalpingography for proximal tubal blockage?: An experience at a single tertiary care center.
    Agrawal N, Fayyaz S.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 48(4):241-245. PubMed ID: 29689309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography and diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation in the assessment of tubal patency for the investigation of subfertility.
    Chan CC, Ng EH, Tang OS, Chan KK, Ho PC.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):909-13. PubMed ID: 16097985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Tubo-peritoneal infertility: comparision of pre-operative hysterosalpingography and laparotomy findings (Tikur Anbessa Hospital, 1995 - 2002).
    Kitilla T.
    Ethiop Med J; 2006 Apr; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 17447380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Analysis of 1006 cases with selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization].
    Li QY, Zhou XL, Qin HP, Liu R.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 15059580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Ultrasonic study with hydrotubation of tubal patency].
    Luo LL.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1990 May; 25(3):149-51, 188. PubMed ID: 2143974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Hamed HO, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 105(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 19339010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Diagnostic value of sonohysterography in the determination of fallopian tube patency as an initial step of routine infertility assessment.
    Hajishafiha M, Zobairi T, Zanjani VR, Ghasemi-Rad M, Yekta Z, Mladkova N.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Dec; 28(12):1671-7. PubMed ID: 19933481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
    Letterie GS, Haggerty MF, Fellows DW.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Dec; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Prediction of laparoscopic surgery outcomes in tubal infertility.
    Kudaiberdieva A, Kangeldieva A.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):460-3. PubMed ID: 16171490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Hysterosalpingography, pre- and postoperative laparoscopy in operative treatment of infertility.
    Schnack Peen UB, Pelle J, Bostofte E, Felding IC.
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1989 Oct; 20(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 2535133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
    Winter L, Glücker T, Steimann S, Fröhlich JM, Steinbrich W, De Geyter C, Pegios W.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Foley catheter for salpingography, pneumonography, tubal insufflation, and hydrotubation.
    Ansari AH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jul; 50(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 876514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertile women.
    Sakar MN, Gul T, Atay AE, Celik Y.
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Sep; 29(9):1315-8. PubMed ID: 18813419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The validity of air and saline hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in tubal patency investigation before insemination treatment.
    Ahinko-Hakamaa K, Huhtala H, Tinkanen H.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 16952418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Hysterosalpingography versus laparoscopy in tubal infertility: comparison based on findings at laparatomy.
    Okonofua FE, Essen UI, Nimalaraj T.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Feb; 28(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 2563701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Is insufflation with carbon dioxide as an ambulatory procedure for evaluating tubal patency obsolete today?].
    Menninger K, Müller T, Albert PJ, Steck T.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995 Feb; 117(7):364-7. PubMed ID: 7668067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal patency].
    Kdous M.
    Tunis Med; 2006 Aug; 84(8):520-5. PubMed ID: 17175698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media.
    Kahyaoglu S, Yumusak OH, Kahyaoglu I, Kucukbas GN, Esercan A, Tasci Y.
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Sonographic hydrotubation using agitated saline: a new technique for improving fallopian tube visualization.
    Chenia F, Hofmeyr GJ, Moolla S, Oratis P.
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Aug; 70(836):833-6. PubMed ID: 9486049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.