These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 8762764

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E, Erkelens CJ.
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Computation of Object Size in Visual Cortical Area V4 as a Neural Basis for Size Constancy.
    Tanaka S, Fujita I.
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug 26; 35(34):12033-46. PubMed ID: 26311782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance.
    Kingdom FA, Simmons DR, Rainville S.
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun 26; 39(12):2127-41. PubMed ID: 10343795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.
    Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H.
    Vision Res; 1985 Jun 26; 25(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 4060612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S, Cumming BG, Read JC.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May 26; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Efficiency of stereopsis in random-dot stereograms.
    Harris JM, Parker AJ.
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1992 Jan 26; 9(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 1738046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Palmisano S, Allison RS, Howard IP.
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan 26; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An investigation of surface reconstruction from binocular disparity based on standard regularization theory: comparison between "membrane" and "thin-plate" potential energy models.
    Shiraiwa A, Hayashi T.
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug 26; 113(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 21987913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Single image random dot stereogram: principles and clinical implications.
    Lee DY, Ireland D.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Apr 26; 67(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 8888831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Changes in neural complexity during the perception of 3D images using random dot stereograms.
    Burgess AP, Rehman J, Williams JD.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Apr 26; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 12694899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A physiological theory of depth perception from vertical disparity.
    Matthews N, Meng X, Xu P, Qian N.
    Vision Res; 2003 Jan 26; 43(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 12505608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.