These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


81 related items for PubMed ID: 8770477

  • 1. Variability in estimation of coronary dimensions from 6F and 8F catheters.
    Legrand V, Raskinet B, Martinez C, Kulbertus H.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):39-45; discussion 46. PubMed ID: 8770477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters).
    Ito S, Kinoshita K, Endo A, Nakamura M, Muramatsu T.
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1752-1757. PubMed ID: 26849831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Validation of 4 French catheters for quantitative coronary analysis: in vivo variability assessment using 6 French guiding catheters as reference scaling devices.
    Sanmartin M, Goicolea J, Castellanos R, Bravo M, Ocaranza R, Cuevas D, Mantilla R, Ruiz-Salmeron R.
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 15152158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative coronary arteriography using 6 and 8 French catheters with cine angiographic acquisition.
    Ellis SG, Pinto IM, McGillem MJ, DeBoe SF, LeFree MT, Mancini GB.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Jan; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1995176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical experience with the ACS RX Lifestream coronary dilatation catheter: a new low profile perfusion balloon catheter.
    Saito T, Yashita S, Noda K, Mizuno Y, Kawabata S, Higa T, Nakahashi E, Iwasa A, Nishiyama K, Ohshima S.
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1995 Jan; 7 Suppl B():39B-45B; discussion 50B-56B. PubMed ID: 10155122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
    Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, Montauban van Swijndregt E, Lehmann KG, Ozaki Y, di Mario C, Kirkeeide R, Serruys PW.
    Circulation; 1995 Apr 15; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of 6F with 7F and 8F guiding catheters for elective coronary angioplasty: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.
    Metz D, Meyer P, Touati C, Coste P, Petiteau PY, Durand P, Faivre R, Lefevre T, Elaerts J.
    Am Heart J; 1997 Jul 15; 134(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 9266794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Lesion length assessment using a new vessel caliper.
    Wolyn R, Dixon SR, Almany SL, Korotko J, Huang RR, O'Neill WW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Feb 15; 58(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 12552538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of 4 and 6 French catheters for coronary angiography: real-world modeling.
    Durst R, Lotan C, Nassar H, Gotsman M, Mor E, Varshitzki B, Greganski P, Jabara R, Admon D, Meerkin D, Mosseri M.
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Apr 15; 9(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 17491224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Limitations in the use of five French coronary catheters.
    Brown EF, Hartnell GG, Morris K, Wilde P.
    Int J Card Imaging; 1991 Apr 15; 7(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1753158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy and precision of quantitative arteriography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease after coronary bypass surgery. A validation study.
    Syvänne M, Nieminen MS, Frick MH.
    Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Dec 15; 10(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 7722345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.