These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


93 related items for PubMed ID: 8776122

  • 21. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery.
    Feese CA, Johnson S, Jones E, Lambers DS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):556.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23921089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The cuticular purse string suture: a modified purse string suture for the partial closure of round postoperative wounds.
    Cohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR.
    Int J Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 46(7):746-53. PubMed ID: 17614809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
    Chibbaro S, Tacconi L.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 16(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 19231198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.
    Zeplin PH, Schmidt K, Laske M, Ziegler UE.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 17452845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Wound infection after ileostomy closure can be eliminated by circumferential subcuticular wound approximation.
    Milanchi S, Nasseri Y, Kidner T, Fleshner P.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Mar; 52(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 19333048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Skin closure of laparotomy wounds: absorbable subcuticular sutures vs. non-absorbable interrupted sutures.
    Anate M.
    West Afr J Med; 1991 Mar; 10(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 1911483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples.
    Dresner HS, Hilger PA.
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs.
    Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N.
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Prospective, randomized, blinded study of a new wound closure film versus cutaneous suture for surgical wound closure.
    Kuo F, Lee D, Rogers GS.
    Dermatol Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 16706763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients.
    Bron T, Zakine G.
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Cost analysis of stapling versus suturing for skin closure.
    Orlinsky M, Goldberg RM, Chan L, Puertos A, Slajer HL.
    Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 13(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 7832962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Subcuticular, continuous and mechanical skin closure: cosmetic results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Zwart HJ, de Ruiter P.
    Neth J Surg; 1989 Jun; 41(3):57-60. PubMed ID: 2501713
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A prospective randomized trial of closing laparoscopic trocar wounds by transcutaneous versus subcuticular suture or adhesive papertape.
    Buchweitz O, Wülfing P, Kiesel L.
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Jan; 19(1):148-51. PubMed ID: 15549624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Procedures for cleansing, closing and covering acute wounds.
    Richardson M.
    Nurs Times; 2005 Jan; 100(4):54-7, 59. PubMed ID: 14974266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of wound-healing characteristics with feedback circuit electrosurgical generators in a porcine model.
    Pollinger HS, Mostafa G, Harold KL, Austin CE, Kercher KW, Matthews BD.
    Am Surg; 2003 Dec; 69(12):1054-60. PubMed ID: 14700290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Sutureless skin closure for pacemaker implantation: comparison with subcuticular suture.
    Pitcher D.
    Postgrad Med J; 1983 Feb; 59(688):83-5. PubMed ID: 6302649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Closure of skin incisions in rabbits by laser soldering: I: Wound healing pattern.
    Simhon D, Brosh T, Halpern M, Ravid A, Vasilyev T, Kariv N, Katzir A, Nevo Z.
    Lasers Surg Med; 2004 Feb; 35(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15278922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Aesthetic and functional efficacy of subcuticular running epidermal closures of the trunk and extremity: a rater-blinded randomized control trial.
    Alam M, Posten W, Martini MC, Wrone DA, Rademaker AW.
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Oct; 142(10):1272-8. PubMed ID: 17043181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of primary wound closure after lateral internal sphincterotomy.
    Aysan E, Aren A, Ayar E.
    Am J Surg; 2004 Feb; 187(2):291-4. PubMed ID: 14769323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.