These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials. Barghi N, Ontiveros JC. Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray. Hsu YT. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Bosser MJ, Nafso AJ. Int J Prosthodont; 1993 Sep; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Brown JS. Int J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Modification of a metal stock tray for a polyvinylsiloxane impression. Haubenreich JE, Osborne PB. J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Aug; 136(8):1138-9. PubMed ID: 16161369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A technique to evaluate custom tray border extensions before peripheral molding. Namratha N, Shetty V. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1603-4. PubMed ID: 25134997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions. Cura C, Isik FG, Dundar M. Gen Dent; 2011 Dec; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques. Mishra S, Chowdhary R. J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quick and effective custom tray for a feeding obturator. Varghese HT, Mathew S. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Sep; 110(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 24029614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures. Yilmaz B, Özçelik TB. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An alternative putty/wash impression technique. Bassi GS. Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):376-8. PubMed ID: 11218529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials. Peregrina A, Land MF, Wandling C, Johnston WM. J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A functional open-tray impression technique for implant-retained overdenture prostheses. Ozcelik TB, Yilmaz B. J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):617-9. PubMed ID: 21651416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts. Rueda LJ, Sy-Muñoz JT, Naylor WP, Goodacre CJ, Swartz ML. Int J Prosthodont; 1996 Oct; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]