These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 8790479

  • 1. Accuracy of ultrasound in a screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Thomas PR, Shaw JC, Ashton HA, Kay DN, Scott RA.
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jan; 1(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8790479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Differences in observer variability of ultrasound measurements of the proximal and distal abdominal aorta.
    Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW, Mulder PG, van der Does E, Hofman A, Laméris JS, Grobbee DE.
    J Med Screen; 1998 Jan; 5(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 9718530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Quality of the measurement of the infrarenal aortic diameter by ultrasound.
    Wilmink AB, Hubbard CS, Quick CR.
    J Med Screen; 1997 Jan; 4(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 9200064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromsø study.
    Singh K, Jacobsen BK, Solberg S, Bønaa KH, Kumar S, Bajic R, Arnesen E.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 May; 25(5):399-407. PubMed ID: 12713777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The difference between ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) measurements of aortic diameter increases with aortic diameter: analysis of axial images of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter in normal and aneurysmal aortas. The Tromsø Study, 1994-1995.
    Singh K, Jacobsen BK, Solberg S, Kumar S, Arnesen E.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Aug; 28(2):158-67. PubMed ID: 15234697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: do the benefits outweigh the costs?
    Mason JM, Wakeman AP, Drummond MF, Crump BJ.
    J Public Health Med; 1993 Jun; 15(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 8353005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods.
    Chiu KW, Ling L, Tripathi V, Ahmed M, Shrivastava V.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 24491283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.
    Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, Messina LM, Ballard DJ, Ansel HJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 21(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 7776474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography.
    Jaakkola P, Hippeläinen M, Farin P, Rytkönen H, Kainulainen S, Partanen K.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Aug; 12(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 8760988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Gloucestershire Aneurysm Screening Programme: the first 2 years' experience.
    Lucarotti M, Shaw E, Poskitt K, Heather B.
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jul; 7(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 8359295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bredahl K, Sandholt B, Lönn L, Rouet L, Ardon R, Eiberg JP, Sillesen H.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 25662155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Changes in diameter of the abdominal aorta with age: an epidemiological study.
    Grimshaw GM, Thompson JM.
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1997 Jan; 25(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 9010802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical Agreement between Nurses in the Ultrasound Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Diameter within a National Screening Programme.
    Crilly MA, Mundie A, Bachoo P, Bruce P, Colvin FA, Geddes WA, Smart HE.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2016 May; 33():194-201. PubMed ID: 26902935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Does a normal screening ultrasound of the abdominal aorta reduce the likelihood of rupture in emergency department patients?
    Hahn B, Bonhomme K, Finnie J, Adwar S, Lesser M, Hirschorn D.
    Clin Imaging; 2016 May; 40(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 27133675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intra- and interobserver variability in ultrasound measurements of abdominal aortic diameter. The Tromsø Study.
    Singh K, Bønaa KH, Solberg S, Sørlie DG, Bjørk L.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1998 Jun; 15(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 9659884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assessment of the accuracy of AortaScan for detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
    Abbas A, Smith A, Cecelja M, Waltham M.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 43(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 22172238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability of the measurement of the abdominal aortic diameter by novice operators using a pocket-sized ultrasound system.
    Bonnafy T, Lacroix P, Desormais I, Labrunie A, Marin B, Leclerc A, Oueslati A, Rollé F, Vignon P, Aboyans V.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013 Dec; 106(12):644-50. PubMed ID: 24246614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme.
    Hartshorne TC, McCollum CN, Earnshaw JJ, Morris J, Nasim A.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 42(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 21439859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta.
    Beales L, Wolstenhulme S, Evans JA, West R, Scott DJ.
    Br J Surg; 2011 Nov; 98(11):1517-25. PubMed ID: 21861264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The role of diameter versus volume as the best prognostic measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Kitagawa A, Mastracci TM, von Allmen R, Powell JT.
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Jul; 58(1):258-65. PubMed ID: 23806259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.