These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 8798037

  • 1. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
    Müller RD, Voss M, Hirche H, Buddenbrock B, John V, Bosch E.
    Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD, Hirche H, Voss M, Buddenbrock B, John V, Gocke P.
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H, Voss M, Blendl C, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, John V, Wiebringhaus R, Turowski B.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Frequency-filtered image post-processing of digital luminescence radiographs in pulmonary nodule imaging.
    Müller RD, Von Koschitzki T, Hirche H, John V, Hering K, Gocke C, Turowski B.
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Aug; 51(8):577-86. PubMed ID: 8761397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M, Lyttkens K, Andersson B, Hochbergs P, Lindberg CG, Medin J, Nordström AJ, Sanfridsson J, Vojciechowski J.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M, Prokop M, Thorns E, Oestmann JW, Reichelt S, Haubitz B, Milbradt H, Gräser A, Verner L, Schaefer C.
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Böhner C, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of varying filter kernel sizes on the image quality of interstitial lung diseases.
    Müller RD, Herting D, Hirche H, John V, Buddenbrock B, Gocke P, Wiebringhaus R, Braunschweig R, Voss M, Mohnke M, Konietzko N.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):732-40. PubMed ID: 8915285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H, Pärtan G, Urban M, Krampla W, Ottes F, Hruby W.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S.
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques.
    Kheddache S, Thilander-Klang A, Lanhede B, Månsson LG, Bjurstam N, Ackerholm P, Björneld L.
    Eur Radiol; 1999 Oct; 9(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 10354868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H, Sanada S, Doi K, Giger M, Xu XW, Yin FF, Montner SM, Carlin M.
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
    Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Oestmann JW, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Computed radiography and direct radiography: influence of acquisition dose on the detection of simulated lung lesions.
    Uffmann M, Prokop M, Eisenhuber E, Fuchsjäger M, Weber M, Schaefer-Prokop C.
    Invest Radiol; 2005 May; 40(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 15829821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U, Reissberg S, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Scherlach C, Döhring W.
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN, Brateman L, Arreola M.
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Strotzer M, Völk M, Wild T, von Landenberg P, Feuerbach S.
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.