These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 8809248

  • 1. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
    Wang RR, Nguyen T, Boyle AM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY, Jameson LM, Moser JB, Hesby RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA, Vermilyea SG, Agar JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The bond strength of elastomer tray adhesives to thermoplastic and acrylic resin tray materials.
    Hogans WR, Agar JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 1507140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992 Apr; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ, Setchell DJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA, Talic YF.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impressions bonded to a custom tray as a function of drying time: Part I.
    Cho GC, Donovan TE, Chee WW, White SN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 May; 73(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 7658389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G, Sato T, Suenaga K, Minagi S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
    Sábio S, Franciscone PA, Mondelli J.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008 Feb; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.