These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Flow cytometric validation of automated differentials in pediatric patients. Finn LS, Hall J, Xu M, Rutledge JC. Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 15224768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision and accuracy of monocyte counting. Comparison of two hematology analyzers, the manual differential and flow cytometry. Hübl W, Hauptlorenz S, Tlustos L, Jilch R, Fischer M, Bayer PM. Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 7531938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the reproducibility of automated monocyte counting using flow cytometry and monoclonal antibodies]. Vives Corrons JL, Besson I, Villamor N, Aymerich M, Marín JL, Jou JM. Sangre (Barc); 1994 Jun; 39(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 7940050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent measurement of antigen- and antibody-dependent oxidative burst and phagocytosis in monocytes and neutrophils. Bassøe CF, Smith I, Sørnes S, Halstensen A, Lehmann AK. Methods; 2000 Jul; 21(3):203-20. PubMed ID: 10873475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a reference method for leukocyte differential counts in blood: comparison of three flow cytometric candidate methods. Roussel M, Davis BH, Fest T, Wood BL, International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH). Cytometry A; 2012 Nov; 81(11):973-82. PubMed ID: 22736499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of automated basophil counting by using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies. Hübl W, Andert S, Erath A, Streicher J, Bayer PM. J Clin Lab Anal; 1996 Nov; 10(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 8811460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Platelet counting by the coulter LH 750, sysmex XE 2100, and advia 120: a comparative analysis using the RBC/platelet ratio reference method. Sandhaus LM, Osei ES, Agrawal NN, Dillman CA, Meyerson HJ. Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Aug; 118(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 12162684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CD45-assisted PanLeucogating for accurate, cost-effective dual-platform CD4+ T-cell enumeration. Glencross D, Scott LE, Jani IV, Barnett D, Janossy G. Cytometry; 2002 Apr 15; 50(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 12116348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed flow cytometric reference method for the determination of erythroid F-cell counts. Chen JC, Bigelow N, Davis BH. Cytometry; 2000 Aug 15; 42(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 10934343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Single platform flow cytometric absolute CD34+ cell counts based on the ISHAGE guidelines. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Weir K, Popma J, Nayar R, Sutherland DR. Cytometry; 1998 Apr 15; 34(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 9579602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer in the differential cytologic analysis of biological fluids (cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others). Aulesa C, Mainar I, Prieto M, Cobos N, Galimany R. Lab Hematol; 2003 Apr 15; 9(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 14649464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Refining the white blood cell differential: the first flow cytometry routine application. Roussel M, Benard C, Ly-Sunnaram B, Fest T. Cytometry A; 2010 Jun 15; 77(6):552-63. PubMed ID: 20506466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward a new reference method for the leukocyte five-part differential. Hübl W, Wolfbauer G, Andert S, Thum G, Streicher J, Hübner C, Lapin A, Bayer PM. Cytometry; 1997 Apr 15; 30(2):72-84. PubMed ID: 9149914 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of monocyte counting with two automated instruments by the use of CD 14-specific immunomagnetic Dynabeads. Theodorsen L. Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Sep 15; 17(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 8719895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]