These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

183 related items for PubMed ID: 8817301

  • 1. The effects of continuous versus interrupted noise exposures on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Chang KW, Norton SJ.
    Hear Res; 1996 Jul; 96(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 8817301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
    Canlon B, Marklund K, Borg E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R, Freeman S, Sohmer H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001 Dec; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Howard MA, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
    Wagner W, Plinkert PK, Vonthein R, Plontke SK.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+Ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Vázquez AE, Jimenez AM, Martin GK, Luebke AE, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15276680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of industrial noise exposure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea--long term experiments in awake guinea pigs.
    Emmerich E, Richter F, Reinhold U, Linss V, Linss W.
    Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 148(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 10978821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W, Yang Y, Zhang W.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.