These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

199 related items for PubMed ID: 8823827

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers.
    Leung SK, Lau CP, Tang MO.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9474646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical observations with a dual sensor rate adaptive single chamber pacemaker.
    Provenier F, van Acker R, Backers J, van Wassenhove E, de Meyer V, Jordaens L.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1821-5. PubMed ID: 1279554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical results of automatic slope adaptation in a dual sensor VVIR pacemaker.
    van Krieken FM, Perrins JP, Sigmund M.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1815-20. PubMed ID: 1279553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers.
    Lau CP, Tai YT, Fong PC, Li JP, Chung FL.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1504-14. PubMed ID: 1383962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. New integrated sensor pacemaker: comparison of rate responses between an integrated minute ventilation and activity sensor and single sensor modes during exercise and daily activities and nonphysiological interference.
    Leung SK, Lau CP, Tang MO, Leung Z.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1664-71. PubMed ID: 8945021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
    Windecker S, Bubien RS, Halperin L, Moore A, Kay GN.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of sensor selection on exercise stroke volume in pacemaker dependent patients.
    Haennel RG, Logan T, Dunne C, Burgess J, Busse E.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 21(9):1700-8. PubMed ID: 9744431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
    Sulke N, Dritsas A, Chambers J, Sowton E.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of continuously recorded sensor and sinus rates during daily life activities and standardized exercise testing: efficacy of automatically optimized rate adaptive dual sensor pacing to simulate sinus rhythm.
    Lau CP, Leung SK, Guerola M, Crijns HJ.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1672-7. PubMed ID: 8945022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Initial clinical experience with rate adaptive cardiac pacing using two sensors simultaneously.
    Landman MA, Senden PJ, van Rooijen H, van Hemel NM.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1615-22. PubMed ID: 1704514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.
    Oldroyd KG, Rae AP, Carter R, Wingate C, Cobbe SM.
    Br Heart J; 1991 Apr; 65(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 1827588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dual sensor pacemakers in children: what is the choice of sensor blending?
    Celiker A, Tokel K, Lenk MK, Ozme S.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 May; 20(5 Pt 1):1301-4. PubMed ID: 9170130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a dual sensor, rate responsive pacemaker.
    Sinha S, Schilling RJ, Kaye GC, Caplin JL.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):1950-4. PubMed ID: 7845797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Direct comparison of a contractility and activity pacemaker sensor during treadmill exercise testing.
    Erol-Yilmaz A, Tukkie R, De Boo J, Schrama T, Wilde A.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov; 27(11):1493-9. PubMed ID: 15546303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
    Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, Sowton E.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar 01; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
    Lau CP, Wong CK, Leung WH, Liu WX.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec 01; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomized, single-blind crossover comparison of the effects of chronic DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing mode on quality-of-life and cardiopulmonary performance in complete heart block.
    Deharo JC, Badier M, Thirion X, Ritter P, Provenier F, Graux P, Guillot C, Mugica J, Jordaens L, Djiane P.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Sep 01; 19(9):1320-6. PubMed ID: 8880795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.