These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


194 related items for PubMed ID: 8831276

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries.
    Harper M, Muller BS.
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 12400909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.
    Anthony TR, Cai C, Mehaffy J, Sleeth D, Volckens J.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 27792469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
    Tatum VL, Ray AE, Rovell-Rixx DC.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Field comparison of two inhalable samplers used in Italy to measure the wood dust exposure.
    Campopiano A, Basili F, Angelosanto F, Cannizzaro A, Olori A, Ramires D, Iannò A, Angelici L.
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2016 Apr; 22(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27373902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Applications of low-cost, dual-fraction dust samplers.
    Kenny L, Chung K, Dilworth M, Hammond C, Wynn Jones J, Shreeve Z, Winton J.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11137697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M, Akbar MZ, Andrew ME.
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Personal sampling in parallel with open-face filter cassettes and IOM samplers for inhalable dust--implications for occupational exposure limits.
    Lidén G, Melin B, Lidblom A, Lindberg K, Norén JO.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Mar; 15(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 10701289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention.
    Borsh FB, Sleeth DK, Handy RG, Pahler LF, Andrews R, Ashley K.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Sep; 16(9):634-642. PubMed ID: 31298629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.