These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

274 related items for PubMed ID: 8851536

  • 1. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.
    Allread WG, Marras WS, Parnianpour M.
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quantification of back motion during asymmetric lifting.
    Ferguson SA, Marras WS, Waters TR.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Feb; 35(7-8):845-59. PubMed ID: 1633792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA, Li YC, Andersson GB, Natarajan RN.
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hand-hold location and trunk kinematics during box handling.
    Haddad O, Mirka GA.
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 20658397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I, Bosch T, Bruins L, van Dieën JH.
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct 22; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effects of horizontal load speed and lifting frequency on lifting technique and biomechanics.
    Dai B, Jin S, Ning X, Mirka GA.
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug 22; 53(8):1024-32. PubMed ID: 20658396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
    Kumar S, Garand D.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Aug 22; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting.
    Marras WS, Davis KG, Kirking BC, Granata KP.
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct 22; 42(10):1258-73. PubMed ID: 10582500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
    Shin G, Mirka G.
    Ergonomics; 2004 May 15; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E, Brandon SCE, Robertson WSP, Fraser R, Freeman BJC, Graham RB, Thewlis D, Jones CF.
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb 13; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N.
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May 13; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.