These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
256 related items for PubMed ID: 8854222
1. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes. Ikarashi Y, Tsuchiya T, Nakamura A. J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M, Iida K, Shiraishi K, Hoshuyama S. J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M, Noda S, Yamazaki S, Kakishima H, Yamasaki K, Kimber I. J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Gerberick GF, Robinson MK, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Basketter DA, Wright Z, Marks JG. Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde. Hilton J, Dearman RJ, Harvey P, Evans P, Basketter DA, Kimber I. Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for the identification of chemical respiratory allergens in rodents: comparisons of cytokine profiling with induced changes in serum IgE. Dearman RJ, Skinner RA, Humphreys NE, Kimber I. J Appl Toxicol; 2003 Mar; 23(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 12884401 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry. Gerberick GF, Cruse LW, Ryan CA. Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of the sensitising potential of various textile dyes using a biphasic murine local lymph node assay. Ahuja V, Platzek T, Fink H, Sonnenburg A, Stahlmann R. Arch Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 84(9):709-18. PubMed ID: 20585758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. Lee JK, Park JH, Park SH, Kim HS, Oh HY. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002 Sep; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay. Jowsey IR, Clapp CJ, Safford B, Gibbons BT, Basketter DA. Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008 Sep; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site. Chipinda I, Anderson SE, Butterworth LF, Beezhold D, Siegel PD. Toxicology; 2009 Mar 29; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of contact sensitivity of four thiourea rubber accelerators: comparison of two mouse lymph node assays with the guinea pig maximization test. Ikarashi Y, Ohno K, Momma J, Tsuchiya T, Nakamura A. Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Nov 29; 32(11):1067-72. PubMed ID: 7959462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. Methods; 2007 Jan 29; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity. Lappin MB, Dearman RJ, Norval M, Kimber I. Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar 29; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and utilization of an ex vivo bromodeoxyuridine local lymph node assay protocol for assessing potential chemical sensitizers. Williams WC, Copeland C, Boykin E, Quell SJ, Lehmann DM. J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan 29; 35(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24532485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Dean JH, Twerdok LE, Tice RR, Sailstad DM, Hattan DG, Stokes WS. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec 29; 34(3):258-73. PubMed ID: 11754530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience. Betts CJ, Dearman RJ, Heylings JR, Kimber I, Basketter DA. Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep 29; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ranking of hair dye substances according to predicted sensitization potency: quantitative structure-activity relationships. Søsted H, Basketter DA, Estrada E, Johansen JD, Patlewicz GY. Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep 29; 51(5-6):241-54. PubMed ID: 15606648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure. De Jong WH, Arts JH, De Klerk A, Schijf MA, Ezendam J, Kuper CF, Van Loveren H. Toxicology; 2009 Jul 10; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay. Basketter DA, Lea LJ, Cooper KJ, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec 10; 10(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10594296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]