These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

957 related items for PubMed ID: 8860274

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG, Broome ME, Dougherty MC, Freda MC, Kearney MH.
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
    Kearney MH, Freda MC.
    Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals.
    Eldredge J.
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1999 Dec; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes.
    Bartus CL, Katz KA.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 16781302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A, Jin YP, Trope GE, Buys YM.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA, Crawford GH, Lu DW, Kantor J, Margolis DJ.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP, Cummings P, Ringold S, Bergman AB, Joffe A, Christakis DA.
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW, Idriss SZ, Kimball AB, Bernhard JD.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
    Bayne SC, McGivney GP, Mazer SC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.