These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: nonlinearities and response interpretation. Ravazzani P, Grandori F. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):500-4. PubMed ID: 8225340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. TEOAE amplitude growth, detectability, and response threshold in linear and nonlinear mode and in different time windows. Hoth S, Polzer M, Neumann K, Plinkert P. Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):407-18. PubMed ID: 17654082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Time-frequency analysis of linear and nonlinear otoacoustic emissions and removal of a short-latency stimulus artifact. Jedrzejczak WW, Bell A, Skarzynski PH, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2200-8. PubMed ID: 22423716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation into the relationship between input-output nonlinearities and rate-induced nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences. Lineton B, Thornton AR, Baker VJ. Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):24-35. PubMed ID: 16839721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction. Arslan RB, Ozdamar O, Ulgen Y. Audiology; 2001 Sep; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences from patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Hine JE, Thornton AR. Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15855037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years. Ferguson MA, Smith PA, Davis AC, Lutman ME. Audiology; 2000 Jan; 39(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 10905398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional filter to facilitate detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Grandori F, Ruohonen J. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9735558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels. Sisto R, Moleti A. J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2183-90. PubMed ID: 17902854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Parazzini M, Grandori F. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12665039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous suppression of tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions--effect of level and presentation paradigm. Killan EC, Kapadia S. Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 16324810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonlinear properties of otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired hearing. Thornton AR, Lineton B, Baker VJ, Slaven A. Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):56-65. PubMed ID: 16839724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Otoacoustic emissions evoked by 0.5 kHz tone bursts. Jedrzejczak WW, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H. J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3158-65. PubMed ID: 19425658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]