These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 8871144

  • 1. Identification of individual microaneurysms: a comparison between fluorescein angiograms and red-free and colour photographs.
    Hellstedt T, Vesti E, Immonen I.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1996 Aug; 234 Suppl 1():S13-7. PubMed ID: 8871144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Peripheral retinal evaluation comparing fundus photographs with fluorescein angiograms in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    Agardh E, Cavallin-Sjöberg U.
    Retina; 1998 Aug; 18(5):420-3. PubMed ID: 9801036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
    Nghiem AZ, Nderitu P, Lukic M, Khatun M, Largan R, Kortuem K, Balaskas K, Sim D.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The normal retinal fluorescein angiogram I. A study of the fluoresceinangiographic appearance of the retina in normal subjects without ophthalmoscopically obvious pathological changes.
    Nielsen NV.
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1982 Oct; 60(5):657-70. PubMed ID: 7164784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two-field 60 degrees fundus photography. A comparison between red-free, black-and-white prints and colour transparencies.
    von Wendt G, Heikkilä K, Summanen P.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Dec; 77(6):638-47. PubMed ID: 10634555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Disparity of microaneurysm count between ultrawide field colour imaging and ultrawide field fluorescein angiography in eyes with diabetic retinopathy.
    Ashraf M, Sampani K, AbdelAl O, Fleming A, Cavallerano J, Souka A, El Baha SM, Silva PS, Sun J, Aiello LP.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 104(12):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 32111607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Automated detection of microaneurysms in digital red-free photographs: a diabetic retinopathy screening tool.
    Hipwell JH, Strachan F, Olson JA, McHardy KC, Sharp PF, Forrester JV.
    Diabet Med; 2000 Aug; 17(8):588-94. PubMed ID: 11073180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A computerized system for localization of diabetic lesions from fundus images.
    Hellstedt T, Palsi VP, Immonen I.
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Jun; 72(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 7976267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Automated measurement of microaneurysm turnover.
    Goatman KA, Cree MJ, Olson JA, Forrester JV, Sharp PF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 44(12):5335-41. PubMed ID: 14638735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fundus autofluorescence and colour fundus imaging compared during telemedicine screening in patients with diabetes.
    Kolomeyer AM, Baumrind BR, Szirth BC, Shahid K, Khouri AS.
    J Telemed Telecare; 2013 Jun; 19(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 24163061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Automatic detection of microaneurysms in colour fundus images].
    Jiménez S, Alemany P, Núñez Benjumea F, Serrano C, Acha B, Fondón I, Carral F, Sánchez C.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2011 Sep; 86(9):277-81. PubMed ID: 21893260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Quantification of diabetic maculopathy by digital imaging of the fundus.
    Phillips RP, Spencer T, Ross PG, Sharp PF, Forrester JV.
    Eye (Lond); 1991 Sep; 5 ( Pt 1)():130-7. PubMed ID: 2060662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Visualization of microaneurysms using optical coherence tomography angiography: comparison of OCTA en face, OCT B-scan, OCT en face, FA, and IA images.
    Hamada M, Ohkoshi K, Inagaki K, Ebihara N, Murakami A.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 62(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 29383540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison between one- and two-field 60 degree fundus photography when screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    von Wendt G, Rönnholm P, Heikkilä K, Summanen P.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Feb; 78(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 10726781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Computer-assisted microaneurysm turnover in the early stages of diabetic retinopathy.
    Bernardes R, Nunes S, Pereira I, Torrent T, Rosa A, Coelho D, Cunha-Vaz J.
    Ophthalmologica; 2009 Feb; 223(5):284-91. PubMed ID: 19372722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Is one 60 degrees fundus photograph sufficient for screening of proliferative diabetic retinopathy?
    Møller F, Hansen M, Sjølie AK.
    Diabetes Care; 2001 Dec; 24(12):2083-5. PubMed ID: 11723087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Disappearance and formation rates of microaneurysms in early diabetic retinopathy.
    Hellstedt T, Immonen I.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Feb; 80(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8814743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computer-aided digitisation of fundus photographs.
    Sleightholm MA, Arnold J, Aldington SJ, Kohner EM.
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1984 Nov; 5(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 6525798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.