These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 8888641

  • 21. Fatigue of accommodation: changes in accommodation after visual work.
    Pigion RG, Miller RJ.
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Dec; 62(12):853-63. PubMed ID: 4083329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effects of a head-mounted display on the oculomotor system of children.
    Kozulin P, Ames SL, McBrien NA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 19543140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Fixation disparity at different viewing distances and the preferred viewing distance in a laboratory near-vision task.
    Jaschinski W.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 9666908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The design of telepresence systems: the task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Parton AD, Bradshaw MF, De Bruyn B.
    Int J Cogn Ergon; 1999 Jan; 3(3):189-202. PubMed ID: 11543418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms.
    Yang SN, Schlieski T, Selmins B, Cooper SC, Doherty RA, Corriveau PJ, Sheedy JE.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1068-80. PubMed ID: 22733100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control.
    MacKenzie KJ, Hoffman DM, Watt SJ.
    J Vis; 2010 Jul 01; 10(8):22. PubMed ID: 20884597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Variability of fixation disparity and accommodation when viewing a CRT visual display unit.
    Jaschinski-Kruza W, Schubert-Alshuth E.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct 01; 12(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 1293527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Short exposure to telestereoscope affects the oculomotor system.
    Neveu P, Priot AE, Plantier J, Roumes C.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Nov 01; 30(6):806-15. PubMed ID: 21205267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Binocular coordination in fore/aft motion.
    Ramat S, Zee DS.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Apr 01; 1039():36-53. PubMed ID: 15826960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A comparative study of monoscopic and stereoscopic display for a probe-positioning task.
    Wang G, Mercier L, Collins DL, Cooperstock JR.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009 Apr 01; 142():417-9. PubMed ID: 19377197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Ordinal depth information from accommodation?
    Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR.
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar 01; 43(3):391-404. PubMed ID: 10755661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement.
    Coull J, Weir PL, Tremblay L, Weeks DJ, Elliott D.
    J Mot Behav; 2000 Dec 01; 32(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 11114228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Reliability of a computer-based system for measuring visual performance skills.
    Erickson GB, Citek K, Cove M, Wilczek J, Linster C, Bjarnason B, Langemo N.
    Optometry; 2011 Sep 01; 82(9):528-42. PubMed ID: 21705283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Accommodation to large disparity stereograms.
    Davis H, Buckley D, Jacobs RE, Brennand DA, Frisby JP.
    J AAPOS; 2002 Dec 01; 6(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 12506280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex.
    Quinlan DJ, Culham JC.
    Neuroimage; 2007 May 15; 36(1):167-87. PubMed ID: 17398117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of viewing distance on accommodative and pupillary responses following a three-dimensional task.
    Iwasaki T, Tawara A.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 Mar 15; 22(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 12014484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Accommodation to perceived depth in stereotests.
    Koh LH, Charman WN.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May 15; 18(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 9829115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Age, degraded viewing environments, and the speed of accommodation.
    Elworth CL, Larry C, Malmstrom FV.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1986 Jan 15; 57(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 3942571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effects of an eyeglass-free 3-D display on the human visual system.
    Suzuki Y, Onda Y, Katada S, Ino S, Ifukube T.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan 15; 48(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 14767642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Relations between individual differences in oculomotor resting states and visual inspection performance.
    Best PS, Littleton MH, Gramopadhye AK, Tyrrell RA.
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jan 15; 39(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 8851070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.