These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
865 related items for PubMed ID: 8893561
1. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses. Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE. Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion. Legarra JJ, Llorens R, Catalan M, Segura I, Trenor AM, de Buruaga JS, Rabago G, Sarralde A. J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén PS. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves. Sarris GE, Robbins RC, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Shumway NE. Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Anderson WN. Can J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 15(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 10504178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. Borger MA, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie-Hrybinsky D, Feindel CM, David TE. J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):49-55; discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 16480012 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD, Bédard P, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Mesana TG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients. Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial. Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ. J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]