These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 8903810

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. An observer-blinded, prospective, randomized comparison of forceps for endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
    Schafer TW, Hollis-Perry KM, Mondragon RM, Brann OS.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11818921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
    Alfa MJ, Nemes R, Olson N, Mulaire A.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A comparison of three types of biopsy forceps in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.
    Dolwani S, Saleem H, Thompson IW, Allison MC.
    Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):946-9. PubMed ID: 12471536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Reprocessing of single-use endoscopic biopsy forceps and snares. One hospital's study.
    Hambrick D.
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001 Dec; 24(3):112-5. PubMed ID: 11847859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of sterilization of reusable endoscopic biopsy forceps by autoclaving and ethylene oxide gas.
    Yoon JH, Yoon BC, Lee HL, Lee JK, Kim YT, Lee DH, Choi IJ, Lee DH, Kim DH.
    Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Feb; 57(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 21904859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
    Ozimek T, Schneider MH, Hupe MC, Wiessmeyer JR, Cordes J, Chlosta PL, Merseburger AS, Kramer MW.
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
    Lee RM, Vida F, Kozarek RA, Raltz SL, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Brandabur JJ, Gluck M, Tomas A, Sumida SE, Irizarry D, Jane C.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Apr; 49(4 Pt 1):477-82. PubMed ID: 10202062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
    Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S, Scherrer M, Rückauer KD, Daschner FD.
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB, Fojecki GL, Papa NP, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D.
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study.
    Jung M, Beilenhoff U, Pietsch M, Kraft B, Rippin G.
    Endoscopy; 2003 Mar; 35(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 12584636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.
    Mager R, Kurosch M, Höfner T, Frees S, Haferkamp A, Neisius A.
    Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):587-593. PubMed ID: 29356873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.