These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
92 related items for PubMed ID: 8915285
1. Effects of varying filter kernel sizes on the image quality of interstitial lung diseases. Müller RD, Herting D, Hirche H, John V, Buddenbrock B, Gocke P, Wiebringhaus R, Braunschweig R, Voss M, Mohnke M, Konietzko N. Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):732-40. PubMed ID: 8915285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of radiographic findings in lung fibrosis using storage phosphor plates. Müller RD, Herting D, Hirche H, John V, Buddenbrock B, Gocke P, Wiebringhaus R, Konietzko N, Langer R. Eur Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 9204345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging. Schaefer CM, Greene R, Llewellyn HJ, Mrose HE, Pile-Spellman EA, Rubens JR, Lindemann SR. Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study. Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T. J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency-filtered image post-processing of digital luminescence radiographs in pulmonary nodule imaging. Müller RD, Von Koschitzki T, Hirche H, John V, Hering K, Gocke C, Turowski B. Clin Radiol; 1996 Aug; 51(8):577-86. PubMed ID: 8761397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography]. Müller RD, Hirche H, Voss M, Buddenbrock B, John V, Gocke P. Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic]. Dölken W, Chowanetz W, Horwitz AE, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Lackner K. Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom. Kroft LJ, Geleijns J, Mertens BJ, Veldkamp WJ, Zonderland HM, de Roos A. Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions. Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M. Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography. Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H, Voss M, Blendl C, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, John V, Wiebringhaus R, Turowski B. Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and hard copy of computed radiography in full and two-thirds sizes in detection of interstitial lung disease. Kondoh H, Ikezoe J, Inamura K, Kuroda C, Kozuka T. J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 7858016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system]. Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K. Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic]. Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Böhner C, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz W. Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Detectability of pulmonary coin lesions: a comparative assessment of the image quality of a storage phosphor system and a conventional film screen system]. Hofmann-Preiss K, Reichler B, Friedel N, Seyferth W. Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 May; 3(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 8518304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects. Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S. Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease and catheters with selenium, storage phosphor, and film-based radiography. Bernhardt TM, Otto D, Reichel G, Ludwig K, Seifert S, Kropf S, Rapp-Bernhardt U. Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):445-54. PubMed ID: 10551225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography. Ganten M, Radeleff B, Kampschulte A, Daniels MD, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model. Ludwig K, Ahlers K, Wormanns D, Freund M, Bernhardt TM, Diederich S, Heindel W. Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques]. Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M. Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]