These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


144 related items for PubMed ID: 8935089

  • 21. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Two-body wear of dental composites under different loads.
    Marquis PM, Hu X, Shortall AC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Nov; 13(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 11203672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials.
    Say EC, Civelek A, Nobecourt A, Ersoy M, Guleryuz C.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Nov; 28(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 14531611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain.
    Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR.
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 14508738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Clinical wear of posterior composites].
    Fallierou A, Mari A.
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989 Sep; 33(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 2486355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials.
    Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, van Putten M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999 Sep; 12(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 10709525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effects of cyclic loading on occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU, Teoh SH, Chew CL.
    Dent Mater; 2002 Mar; 18(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 11755594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite.
    Tagtekin DA, Yanikoglu FC, Bozkurt FO, Kologlu B, Sur H.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 15081556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.