These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
237 related items for PubMed ID: 8937108
1. [Objective visual field measurement using "pupil perimetry"]. Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Mukuno K, Ishikawa S. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 100(10):825-31. PubMed ID: 8937108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients. Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Tanakadate A, Ishikawa S. J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. Kardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS. Ophthalmology; 1991 Apr; 98(4):485-95; discussion 495-6. PubMed ID: 2052302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Beck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lichter PR. Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pupillometer-based objective chromatic perimetry in normal eyes and patients with retinal photoreceptor dystrophies. Skaat A, Sher I, Kolker A, Elyasiv S, Rosenfeld E, Mhajna M, Melamed S, Belkin M, Rotenstreich Y. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr 17; 54(4):2761-70. PubMed ID: 23482470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing pupil function with visual function in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Bremner FD, Shallo-Hoffmann J, Riordan-Eva P, Smith SE. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Oct 17; 40(11):2528-34. PubMed ID: 10509646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Pupil Fields Using a Newly Developed Head-mounted Perimeter in Healthy Subjects. Asakawa K, Nanno M, Ishikawa H, Shoji N. J Glaucoma; 2018 Sep 17; 27(9):807-815. PubMed ID: 29952823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability. Hong S, Narkiewicz J, Kardon RH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr 17; 42(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 11274072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry. Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec 17; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognosis of glaucoma investigated with computerized perimetry. de Natale R, Glaab-Schrems E, Krieglstein GK. Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Dec 15; 58(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 6549289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical study of the visual field defects caused by occipital lobe lesions. Ogawa K, Ishikawa H, Suzuki Y, Oishi M, Kamei S. Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Dec 15; 37(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 24435066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pupil campimetry in patients with visual field loss. Schmid R, Luedtke H, Wilhelm BJ, Wilhelm H. Eur J Neurol; 2005 Aug 15; 12(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 16053467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias. Taravati P, Woodward KR, Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Redline D, Carolan J, Huang CQ, Wall M. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar 15; 49(3):924-8. PubMed ID: 18326713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Wong AY, Dodge RM, Remington LA. J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov 15; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A dissociation of thresholds between Goldmann kinetic perimetry and high-pass resolution perimetry in retinitis pigmentosa]. Tokuhisa T, Oyama K, Tamaki R, Kitahara K. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov 15; 96(11):1429-32. PubMed ID: 1476073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb 15; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective perimetry using functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with visual field loss. Furuta A, Nakadomari S, Misaki M, Miyauchi S, Iida T. Exp Neurol; 2009 Jun 15; 217(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 19348794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]