These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


374 related items for PubMed ID: 8942132

  • 1. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
    Salmon TO, Horner DG.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA, Grosvenor T.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of refractive techniques.
    McKendrick AM, Brennan NA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Dec; 66(12):758-65. PubMed ID: 8557954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
    Rosenfield M, Chiu NN.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA, Tractenberg RE, Saba CM, Douglas JC, Lustbader JM.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R, Soong K, Brian G, Ramke J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A, Conversa MA, Albarrán Diego C, Micó V.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Autorefraction as an outcome measure of laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Pesudovs K.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1921-8. PubMed ID: 15342056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An historical review of optometric principles and techniques.
    Bennett AG.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986 Sep; 6(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 3520440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Objective refraction from monochromatic wavefront aberrations via Zernike power polynomials.
    Robert Iskander D, Davis BA, Collins MJ, Franklin R.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 17470237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.