These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

74 related items for PubMed ID: 8947335

  • 1. Estimation of skin prick test reactions with a scanning program.
    Pijnenborg H, Nilsson L, Dreborg S.
    Allergy; 1996 Nov; 51(11):782-8. PubMed ID: 8947335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.
    Pagani M, Antico A, Cilia M, Calabrò D, Poto S, Pecora S, Burastero SE.
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2009 Feb; 41(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19496349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Morphometry in skin-test methodological studies--validation of the point-counting technique for precise area determination.
    Antico A.
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Jun; 36(6):219-24. PubMed ID: 15329004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Critical evaluation of the use of skin tests and cellular tests in standardization of allergens.
    de Weck AL, Derer T.
    Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M; 1994 Jun; (87):89-114; discussion 114-7. PubMed ID: 7873071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Use of thermographic methods for estimation of skin prick test results. II. Evaluation of skin prick test results with histamine solutions of different concentration using liquid crystal mixtures].
    Zuber J, Kruszewski J, Zmija J, Kłosowicz S, Jung A.
    Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 1996 Jun; 64(3-4):123-31. PubMed ID: 8754955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.
    Lin RY, Erlich ER, Don PC.
    Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
    Corder WT, Hogan MB, Wilson NW.
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
    Nelson HS, Lahr J, Buchmeier A, McCormick D.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Objective evaluation of skin prick test reactions using digital photography.
    dos Santos RV, Titus RG, Lima HC.
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17374055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The longest wheal diameter is the optimal measurement for the evaluation of skin prick tests.
    Konstantinou GN, Bousquet PJ, Zuberbier T, Papadopoulos NG.
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2010 May; 151(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 19851076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].
    Paranos S, Petrović S, Bojović I.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000 May; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of three methods of using the DermaPIK with the standard prick method for epicutaneous skin testing.
    Corder WT, Wilson NW.
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Nov; 75(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 7583866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Automated measurement of skin prick tests: an advance towards exact calculation of wheal size.
    Wöhrl S, Vigl K, Binder M, Stingl G, Prinz M.
    Exp Dermatol; 2006 Feb; 15(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 16433683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reproducibility of histamine skin prick test. Inter- and intravariation using histamine dihydrochloride 1, 5, and 10 mg/ml.
    Taudorf E, Malling HJ, Laursen LC, Lanner A, Weeke B.
    Allergy; 1985 Jul; 40(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 4037255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
    Nelson HS, Knoetzer J, Bucher B.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A, Barczyk A, Pierzchała W.
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Comparative activity of antihistamines on area under dose-response curve from histamine-induced wheal and flare responses in human skin].
    Wang RQ, Zhang HY.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2004 Dec; 26(6):634-8. PubMed ID: 15663222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.