These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
97 related items for PubMed ID: 8949680
1. Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography. Verdun FR, Moeckli R, Valley JF, Bochud F, Hessler C. Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):762-8. PubMed ID: 8949680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose. Ng KH, Jamal N, DeWerd L. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006 Aug; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [A program devoted to dose and quality in mammography (DQM)]. Rimondi O, Gambaccini M, Indovina P, Candini G. Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 3704212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations. McLean D, Eckert M, Heard R, Chan W. Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assurance breast phantoms for screen-film mammography: design and use. Stanton L, Villafana T. Appl Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(11):41-8. PubMed ID: 10304413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects. Ciraj-Bjelac O, Avramova-Cholakova S, Beganovic A, Economides S, Faj D, Gershan V, Grupetta E, Kharita MH, Milakovic M, Milu C, Muhogora WE, Muthuvelu P, Oola S, Setayeshi S, Schandorf C, Ursulean I, Videnovic IR, Zaman A, Ziliukas J, Rehani MM. Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2161-8. PubMed ID: 21665395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography. Dimakopoulou AD, Tsalafoutas IA, Georgiou EK, Yakoumakis EN. Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria. Vassileva J, Avramova-Cholakova S, Dimov A, Lichev A. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Feb; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of acceptability criteria in mammography. Faulkner K, Malone JF, Bosmans H. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 23169814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography. Adliene D, Adlys G, Cerapaite R, Jonaitiene E, Cibulskaite I. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Feb; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada. Suleiman OH, Spelic DC, McCrohan JL, Symonds GR, Houn F. Radiology; 1999 Feb; 210(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the area of Madrid. Morán P, Chevalier M, Vanó E. Br J Radiol; 1994 Jun; 67(798):556-63. PubMed ID: 8032809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Latent image fading and mean glandular dose in mobile mammographic screening. Robson KJ, Kotre CJ, Faulkner K. Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1148-9. PubMed ID: 1286432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]