These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
85 related items for PubMed ID: 8953444
1. Hemodynamic evaluation of 23 mm Pericarbon and 23 mm Hancock II bioprostheses in the aortic position at mid-term follow up. Ius P, Totis O, Chirillo F, Cavarzerani A, Zussa C, Piccoli C, Valfrè C. J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 8953444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Early postoperative outcome and hemodynamic performance of the sorin pericarbon stentless aortic valve. Bonacchi M, Giunti G, Prifti E, Rostagno C, Bini M, Frati G, Sani G. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 12358408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Hancock II versus the Perimount aortic bioprostheses. Chan V, Kulik A, Tran A, Hendry P, Masters R, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Circulation; 2010 Sep 14; 122(11 Suppl):S10-6. PubMed ID: 20837899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [A mid-term clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the Wessex and Hancock II bioprostheses]. Santalla A, Rodríguez-Bailón I, Calleja M, Tercedor L, Cervera S, Lara J, Moreno T. Rev Esp Cardiol; 1992 Sep 14; 45(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 1631383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis. Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Wagner I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov 14; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus. Wagner IM, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, Botzenhardt F, Gebauer I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May 14; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Bach DS, Goldman B, Verrier E, Petracek M, Wood J, Goldman S, David T, Toronto SPV Valve Study Group. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar 14; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, de O, da C, Vrandecic E. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan 14; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison. Borger MA, Nette AF, Maganti M, Feindel CM. Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun 14; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Echocardiographic features of the normofunctional Labcor-Santiago pericardial bioprosthesis. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Bengoechea JB, Vega M, Rubio J, Sierra J, Duran D, Amaro A, Gil M. J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep 14; 3(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 8000591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Three years' experience with the sorin pericarbon stentless prosthesis: mid-term results with three different implantation techniques. Nagy ZL, Bodi A, Len A, Balogh I, Peterffy A. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan 14; 14(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 15700439 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses. Levine FH, Carter JE, Buckley MJ, Daggett WM, Akins CW, Austen WG. Circulation; 1981 Aug 14; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Two years' clinical experience with a quadrileaflet stentless bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Aybek T, Simon A, Dogan S, Greinecker GW, Moritz A. J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Sep 14; 9(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 11041182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stentless aortic valve replacement with the biocor prosthesis: indications and outcome. Achtelik M, Pethig K, Schäfers HJ, Borst HG. J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov 14; 5 Suppl 3():S314-6. PubMed ID: 8953460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement. Jamieson WR, David TE, Feindel CM, Miyagishima RT, Germann E. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May 14; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis and the Hancock pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position]. Cohen-Solal A, Leroy G, Hittinger L, Fernandez F, Gay J, Gourgon R. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Mar 14; 79(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 3087318 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamic and clinical comparison of the Hancock modified orifice and standard orifice bioprostheses in the aortic position. Rossiter SJ, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Mace JG, Robert EW, Tsagaris TJ, Sutton RB, Alderman EL, Shumway NE. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Jul 14; 80(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 7382536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcome of a simplified technique for aortic valve replacement with stentless bioprostheses. Di Matteo G, Masala N, Swanevelder J, Davies J, Galiñanes M, Sosnowski AW. J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jan 14; 18(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19301562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Twelve-year follow up with the Sorin Pericarbon bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Caimmi PP, Di Summa M, Galloni M, Gastaldi L, Papillo B, Actis Dato GM, Agaccio G, Donegani E, Poletti G, Morea M. J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul 14; 7(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 9697061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]