These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

77 related items for PubMed ID: 896011

  • 1. Hemifield differences in visual perception in deaf and hearing subjects.
    Phippard D.
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(4-5):555-61. PubMed ID: 896011
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Visual half-field word recognition as a function of syntactic class and imageability.
    Day J.
    Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 514486
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cerebral lateralization of deaf and hearing individuals for linguistic comparison judgments.
    Ross P, Pergament L, Anisfeld M.
    Brain Lang; 1979 Jul; 8(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 476477
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of two groups of mentally retarded children on The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities.
    Glovsky L.
    Train Sch Bull (Vinel); 1970 May; 67(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 5483982
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. CEREBRAL DOMINANCE AND SPEECH ACQUISITION IN DEAF CHILDREN.
    GOTTLIEB G, DORAN C.
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1964 Aug; 69():182-9. PubMed ID: 14213289
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Lexical decisions in the right and left cerebral hemispheres.
    Leiber L.
    Brain Lang; 1976 Jul; 3(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 949596
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Role of vocal labeling in memory for object arrangements by deaf and hearing children.
    Chovan WL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Feb; 34(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 5011851
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface.
    Bryden MP, Allard F.
    Brain Lang; 1976 Apr; 3(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 938926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [EEG study of the functional specialization of the hemispheres in profound hearing disorders].
    Machinskaia RI.
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1987 Apr; 37(2):356-8. PubMed ID: 3590981
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hemispheric laterality of deaf children for processing words and pictures visually presented to the hemifields.
    Kelly RR, Tomlinson-Keasey C.
    Am Ann Deaf; 1977 Dec; 122(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 605883
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Non-verbal IQ is correlated with visual field advantages for short duration coherent motion detection in deaf signers with varied ASL exposure and etiologies of deafness.
    Samar VJ, Parasnis I.
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 17574715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The role of stimulus discriminability and verbal codability in hemispheric specialization for visuospatial tasks.
    Berlucchi G, Brizzolara D, Marzi CA, Rizzolatti G, Umiltà C.
    Neuropsychologia; 1979 Dec; 17(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 460578
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.