These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 896093

  • 1. Fetal monitoring in a community hospital. A statistical analysis.
    Amato JC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 50(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 896093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Lee WK, Baggish MS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 1264397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Antepartum nonstress test and the postmature pregnancy.
    Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Perrotta LA, McGovern G, Katz N.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 4011074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Experiences with fetal monitoring in a community hospital.
    Kelly VC, Kulkarni D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jun; 41(6):818-24. PubMed ID: 4708480
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E.
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The results of a five-year study of continuous fetal monitoring on an obstetric service.
    Gabert HA, Stenchever MA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 50(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 896094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor.
    Shenker L, Post RC, Seiler JS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Compound presentation of the fetus.
    Weissberg SM, O'Leary JA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jan; 41(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 4682615
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Rural obstetrics: a 5-year prospective study of the outcomes of all pregnancies in a remote northern community.
    Grzybowski SC, Cadesky AS, Hogg WE.
    CMAJ; 1991 Apr 15; 144(8):987-94. PubMed ID: 2009477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
    Leeman L, Leeman R.
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb 15; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts.
    MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, Malloy MH.
    Birth; 2006 Sep 15; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 16948717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Symphysiotomy or caesarean section after failed trial of assisted delivery.
    Mola GD.
    P N G Med J; 1995 Sep 15; 38(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9522856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Perinatal outcome in monitored and unmonitored high-risk deliveries.
    Weinraub Z, Caspi E, Brook I, Rahmani P, Bukovsky I, Schreyer P.
    Isr J Med Sci; 1978 Feb 15; 14(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 649354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA, Shy KK, van Belle G, Larson EB, Hughes JP, Benedetti TJ, Brown ZA, Effer S, King JF, Stenchever MA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May 15; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Addiction in pregnancy: high risk intrapartum management and outcome.
    Silver H, Wapner R, Loriz-Vega M, Finnegan LP.
    J Perinatol; 1987 May 15; 7(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 3504452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Spong CY, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU).
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr 15; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.