These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

446 related items for PubMed ID: 8969474

  • 1. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK, Jassir D, Stagner BB, Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R, Salvi R, Chen L.
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996 Apr; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C, Sininger YS, Ekelid M, Zeng FG.
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep 01; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr 01; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May 01; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The development of cochlear frequency resolution in the human auditory system.
    Abdala C, Sininger YS.
    Ear Hear; 1996 Oct 01; 17(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 8909885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar 01; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct 01; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R, Probst R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan 01; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
    Oswald JA, Rosner T, Janssen T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun 01; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Exploring Optimal Stimulus Frequency Ratio for Measurement of the Quadratic f2-f1 Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission in Humans.
    Baiduc RR, Dhar S.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul 13; 61(7):1794-1806. PubMed ID: 29946695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD, Kemp DT.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan 13; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A developmental study of distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in humans.
    Abdala C.
    Hear Res; 1998 Jul 13; 121(1-2):125-38. PubMed ID: 9682815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jul 13; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.