These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

280 related items for PubMed ID: 8993997

  • 1. Age-related changes in child and adolescent event-related potential component morphology, amplitude and latency to standard and target stimuli in an auditory oddball task.
    Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Anderson JW, Coyle SF.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996 Dec; 24(3):223-38. PubMed ID: 8993997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The mismatch negativity and the P3a components of the auditory event-related potentials in autistic low-functioning subjects.
    Ferri R, Elia M, Agarwal N, Lanuzza B, Musumeci SA, Pennisi G.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 114(9):1671-80. PubMed ID: 12948796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of aging on event-related brain potentials and reaction times in an auditory oddball task.
    Iragui VJ, Kutas M, Mitchiner MR, Hillyard SA.
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 8416055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Topographic distribution and developmental timecourse of auditory event-related potentials in two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Anderson JW.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Aug; 42(1):73-94. PubMed ID: 11451480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Aging-related changes in processing of non-target and target stimuli during an auditory oddball task.
    Amenedo E, Díaz F.
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Aug; 48(3):235-67. PubMed ID: 9788763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values.
    Tomé D, Barbosa F, Nowak K, Marques-Teixeira J.
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2015 Mar; 122(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 24961573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of sex differences on event-related potentials in young adults.
    Gölgeli A, Süer C, Ozesmi C, Dolu N, Aşcioğlu M, Sahin O.
    Int J Neurosci; 1999 Aug; 99(1-4):69-77. PubMed ID: 10495197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Auditory ERPs to non-target stimuli in schizophrenia: relationship to probability, task-demands, and target ERPs.
    O'Donnell BF, Hokama H, McCarley RW, Smith RS, Salisbury DF, Mondrow E, Nestor PG, Shenton ME.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Aug; 17(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 7806466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Long latency auditory evoked potentials in schoolchildren and adolescents with epilepsy].
    Zgorzalewicz M.
    Przegl Lek; 2006 Aug; 63 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 17471817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Developmental trends of auditory novelty oddball P3 while accounting for N2 in 7- to 25-year-olds.
    Mingils SM, Davies PL, Stephens JA, Gavin WJ.
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Apr; 60(4):e14214. PubMed ID: 36350088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Development and topography of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs): mismatch and processing negativity in individuals 8-22 years of age.
    Oades RD, Dittmann-Balcar A, Zerbin D.
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Nov; 34(6):677-93. PubMed ID: 9401422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Age-changed normative auditory event-related potential value in children in Taiwan.
    Tsai ML, Hung KL, Tao-Hsin Tung W, Chiang TR.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2012 May; 111(5):245-52. PubMed ID: 22656394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
    Wise V, McFarlane AC, Clark CR, Battersby M.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects.
    Michalewski HJ, Prasher DK, Starr A.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Jan; 65(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 2416547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Normal variation of P300 in children: age, memory span, and head size.
    Polich J, Ladish C, Burns T.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Oct; 9(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 2276942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of immediate and short-term retest on the latencies and amplitudes of the auditory event-related potentials in healthy adults.
    Gandelman-Marton R, Theitler J, Klein C, Rabey JM.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jan 30; 186(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 19854216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. P300 in young and elderly subjects: auditory frequency and intensity effects.
    Vesco KK, Bone RC, Ryan JC, Polich J.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jan 30; 88(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 7688285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.