These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

508 related items for PubMed ID: 9002869

  • 1. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA, Meiers JC.
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan 01; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC, Neme AM, Pink FE, Hughes PJ.
    Oper Dent; 1998 Jan 01; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers.
    Tate WH, Powers JM.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Jan 01; 21(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8957918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M.
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct 01; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct 01; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA.
    J Dent; 2000 Jul 01; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun 01; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials.
    Grossman ES, Rosen M, Cleaton-Jones PE, Volchansky A.
    SADJ; 2004 Aug 01; 59(7):274, 276, 278-9. PubMed ID: 15537027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing time.
    Yap AU, Ong SB, Yap WY, Tan WS, Yeo JC.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Aug 01; 27(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 12216564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.