These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

132 related items for PubMed ID: 9022721

  • 21. Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison.
    Mostafa MG, Srivannaboon S, Rachanawutanon M.
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12583415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Biopsy-based comparison of liquid-based, thin-layer preparations to conventional Pap smears.
    Vassilakos P, Schwartz D, de Marval F, Yousfi L, Broquet G, Mathez-Loic F, Campana A, Major A.
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Jan; 45(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10664941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of the CytoRich slide preparation process.
    Laverty CR, Farnsworth A, Thurloe JK, Grieves A, Bowditch R.
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9196807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
    Tench W.
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
    Uyar DS, Eltabbakh GH, Mount SL.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
    Hessling JJ, Raso DS, Schiffer B, Callicott J, Husain M, Taylor D.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
    Solomon HM, Frist S.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Oct; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    McGoogan E, Colgan TJ, Ramzy I, Cochand-Priollet B, Davey DD, Grohs HK, Gurley AM, Husain OA, Hutchinson ML, Knesel EA, Linder J, Mango LJ, Mitchell H, Peebles A, Reith A, Robinowitz M, Sauer T, Shida S, Solomon D, Topalidis T, Wilbur DC, Yamauchi K.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Oct; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
    Negri G, Menia E, Egarter-Vigl E, Vittadello F, Mian C.
    Cancer; 2003 Dec 25; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Application of the CellDetect® staining technique in diagnosis of human cervical cancer.
    He S, Wang GL, Zhu YY, Wu MH, Ji ZG, Seng J, Ji Y, Zhou JM, Chen L.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb 25; 132(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 24361533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of the CytoRich technique for cervical smears.
    Stevens MW, Nespolon WW, Milne AJ, Rowland R.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Mar 25; 18(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 9523146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
    Guo M, Hu L, Martin L, Liu S, Baliga M, Hughson MD.
    Acta Cytol; 2005 Mar 25; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study.
    Davey E, d'Assuncao J, Irwig L, Macaskill P, Chan SF, Richards A, Farnsworth A.
    BMJ; 2007 Jul 07; 335(7609):31. PubMed ID: 17604301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW, Kaufman RH, Taylor DA.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Jul 07; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.