These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 9022722

  • 1. Clinical trials of the CytoRich specimen-preparation device for cervical cytology. Preliminary results.
    Wilbur DC, Facik MS, Rutkowski MA, Mulford DK, Atkison KM.
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9022722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site.
    Bishop JW.
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology.
    Howell LP, Davis RL, Belk TI, Agdigos R, Lowe J.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 9479336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficacy of monolayer preparations for cervical cytology: emphasis on suboptimal specimens.
    Vassilakos P, Cossali D, Albe X, Alonso L, Hohener R, Puget E.
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 8669185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    McGoogan E, Colgan TJ, Ramzy I, Cochand-Priollet B, Davey DD, Grohs HK, Gurley AM, Husain OA, Hutchinson ML, Knesel EA, Linder J, Mango LJ, Mitchell H, Peebles A, Reith A, Robinowitz M, Sauer T, Shida S, Solomon D, Topalidis T, Wilbur DC, Yamauchi K.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system.
    Bolick DR, Hellman DJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9479342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
    Austin RM, Ramzy I.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
    Khalbuss WE, Rudomina D, Kauff ND, Chuang L, Melamed MR.
    Cancer; 2000 Jun 25; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
    Negri G, Menia E, Egarter-Vigl E, Vittadello F, Mian C.
    Cancer; 2003 Dec 25; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of the CytoRich technique for cervical smears.
    Stevens MW, Nespolon WW, Milne AJ, Rowland R.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Mar 25; 18(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 9523146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ, Valente PT.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Mar 25; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.