These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 905070

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used.
    Foster RM, Franz VH.
    Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of distance between standard and comparison lines on the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Pressey AW, Di Lollo V.
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Nov; 24(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 745928
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Attention and the Müller-Lyer illusion: simulation of an experiment by Larsen and Garn.
    Pressey AW, Kersten B.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1323-9. PubMed ID: 2762095
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contextual influences on judgments of linear extent.
    Brigell M, Uhlarik J, Goldhorn P.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 Feb; 3(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 845553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Manipulating the strength of the Ponzo and horizontal-vertical illusions through extraction of local cue information.
    Searleman A, Porac C, Alvin J, Peaslee K.
    Am J Psychol; 2009 Feb; 122(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 19827706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assimilation and contrast in the parallel lines illusion?
    Jaeger T.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Jun; 52(3):837-8. PubMed ID: 7267258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions: common effects.
    Greist-Bousquet S, Schiffman HR.
    Perception; 1985 Jun; 14(4):427-47. PubMed ID: 3834386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller--Lyer illusion.
    Pressey AW, Di Lollo V, Tait RW.
    Perception; 1977 Jun; 6(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 917731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus-Titchener and Delboeuf illusions.
    Byosiere SE, Feng LC, Woodhead JK, Rutter NJ, Chouinard PA, Howell TJ, Bennett PC.
    Anim Cogn; 2017 May; 20(3):435-448. PubMed ID: 28008543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Virtual and drawing structures for the Müller-Lyer illusions.
    Redding GM, Vinson DW.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1350-66. PubMed ID: 20601716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assimilation and contrast in geometrical illusions: a theoretical analysis.
    Jaeger TB.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Aug; 89(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 10544426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Davies TN, Spencer J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 905080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.