These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 9054896

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Thresholds for human detection of patient setup errors in digitally reconstructed portal images of prostate fields.
    Phillips BL, Jiroutek MR, Tracton G, Elfervig M, Muller KE, Chaney EL.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep 01; 54(1):270-7. PubMed ID: 12183001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Registration of electronic portal images for patient set-up verification.
    Matsopoulos GK, Asvestas PA, Delibasis KK, Kouloulias V, Uzunoglu N, Karaiskos P, Sandilos P.
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul 21; 49(14):3279-89. PubMed ID: 15357197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images.
    Dong L, Boyer AL.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec 01; 33(5):1053-60. PubMed ID: 7493831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results.
    Topolnjak R, Sonke JJ, Nijkamp J, Rasch C, Minkema D, Remeijer P, van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov 15; 78(4):1235-43. PubMed ID: 20472368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data.
    Gilhuijs KG, van de Ven PJ, van Herk M.
    Med Phys; 1996 Mar 15; 23(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 8815382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of daily image guidance for hypofractionated liver radiotherapy with active breathing control.
    Dawson LA, Eccles C, Bissonnette JP, Brock KK.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul 15; 62(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 15990028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Simulation of 3D-treatment plans in head and neck tumors aided by matching of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and on-line distortion corrected simulator images.
    Lohr F, Schramm O, Schraube P, Sroka-Perez G, Seeber S, Schlepple G, Schlegel W, Wannenmacher M.
    Radiother Oncol; 1997 Nov 15; 45(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 9424012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Computation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiotherapy treatment design.
    Sherouse GW, Novins K, Chaney EL.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Mar 15; 18(3):651-8. PubMed ID: 2318699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
    Mubata CD, Bidmead AM, Ellingham LM, Thompson V, Dearnaley DP.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan 01; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Procedures for high precision setup verification and correction of lung cancer patients using CT-simulation and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR).
    Van Sörnsen de Koste JR, de Boer HC, Schuchhard-Schipper RH, Senan S, Heijmen BJ.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar 01; 55(3):804-10. PubMed ID: 12573768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. SU-E-J-26: Automated Estimation Method of Patient Setup Errors Using Simulated Portal Images for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.
    Matsushita N, Arimura H, Shioyama Y, Magome T, Nakamura K, Umezu Y, Yoshitake T, Anai S, Yoshidome S, Honda H, Ohki M, Toyofuku F, Hirata H.
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun 01; 39(6Part6):3658. PubMed ID: 28517569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different image assessment methods for tangential breast radiotherapy.
    Batumalai V, Phan P, Choong C, Holloway L, Delaney GP.
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2016 Dec 01; 63(4):224-231. PubMed ID: 27741383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of computer workstation with light box for detecting setup errors from portal images.
    Boxwala AA, Chaney EL, Fritsch DS, Raghavan S, Coffey CS, Major SA, Muller KE.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jun 01; 44(3):711-6. PubMed ID: 10348303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of geometric uncertainties using electronic portal imaging device in focal three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy using different head supports.
    Budrukkar A, Dutta D, Sharma D, Yadav P, Dantas S, Jalali R.
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2008 Jun 01; 4(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 18688122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.