These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

319 related items for PubMed ID: 9057512

  • 1. Acute appendicitis: MR imaging and sonographic correlation.
    Incesu L, Coskun A, Selcuk MB, Akan H, Sozubir S, Bernay F.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 9057512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Francis IR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. MR imaging in children with nonperforated acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced MR imaging in sonographically selected cases.
    Hörmann M, Paya K, Eibenberger K, Dorffner R, Lang S, Kreuzer S, Metz VM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):467-70. PubMed ID: 9694477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Barone RM, Lacey C, Sigeti JS, Alzate GD, Sebrechts CP.
    Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR, Schomer DF, Chappell P, Enzmann DR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
    Low RN, Sigeti JS.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography.
    Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):539-42. PubMed ID: 1503019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN, Francis IR, Herfkens RJ, Jeffrey RB, Glazer GM, Foo TK, Shimakawa A, Pelc NJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction versus T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging in the follow-up of colorectal neoplasm: a prospective study of 41 patients.
    Kinkel K, Tardivon AA, Soyer P, Spatz A, Lasser P, Rougier P, Vanel D.
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 8685341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Right-lower-quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging--initial experience.
    Oto A, Ernst RD, Shah R, Koroglu M, Chaljub G, Gei AF, Zacharias N, Saade G.
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):445-51. PubMed ID: 15591434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
    Müller-Schimpfle M, Stoll P, Stern W, Kurz S, Dammann F, Claussen CD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W, Knopp MV, Schaeffer U, Brix G, Essig M, Hoffmann U, Zuna I, Schönberg S, van Kaick G.
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy.
    Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM.
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 16505393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Detection of pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT.
    Yamashita Y, Honda S, Nishiharu T, Urata J, Takahashi M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 8615260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Value of gadolinium-enhanced MRI in detection of acute appendicitis in children and adolescents.
    Rosines LA, Chow DS, Lampl BS, Chen S, Gordon S, Mui LW, Aspelund G, Ruzal-Shapiro CB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W543-8. PubMed ID: 25341169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography.
    Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP, Kesling KL, Christensen KP, Null RN, Radvany MG, Hansen MF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 8079858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded prospective study.
    Poortman P, Lohle PN, Schoemaker CM, Oostvogel HJ, Teepen HJ, Zwinderman KA, Hamming JF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1355-9. PubMed ID: 14573433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging.
    Kim B, Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Chalpin DB, Carroll PR, Hricak H.
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 8090898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.