These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

199 related items for PubMed ID: 9058868

  • 21. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
    Lau CP, Tai YT, Leung WH, Wong CK, Lee P, Chung FL.
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
    Sulke N, Dritsas A, Chambers J, Sowton E.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Cardiopulmonary stress: control of the function of frequency variable pacemaker systems].
    Treese N, Coutinho M, Ophoff N, Rhein S, Pop T, Meyer J.
    Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 2378157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Physical work capacity with rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) versus dual chamber pacing (DDD) in patients with normal and diminished left ventricular function.
    Frielingsdorf J, Dür P, Gerber AE, Vuilliomenet A, Bertel O.
    Int J Cardiol; 1995 May; 49(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 7649670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response: evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
    Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, Benson DW, Dunnigan A, Molina E, Gornick CC, Almquist A.
    Circulation; 1987 Jan; 75(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 3791604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of low rate dual chamber pacing to activity responsive rate variable ventricular pacing.
    Batey RL, Sweesy MW, Scala G, Forney RC.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 May; 13(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 1693204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
    Passman R, Banthia S, Galvez D, Sheldon T, Kadish A.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19140906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Rate-modulated cardiac pacing based on transthoracic impedance measurements of minute ventilation: correlation with exercise gas exchange.
    Kay GN, Bubien RS, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Nov 01; 14(5):1283-9. PubMed ID: 2808984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
    Rediker DE, Eagle KA, Homma S, Gillam LD, Harthorne JW.
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb 01; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effects of rate responsive pacing on exercise performance in the postoperative univentricular heart.
    Paridon SM, Karpawich PP, Pinsky WW.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun 01; 16(6):1256-62. PubMed ID: 7686655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Improvement of exercise tolerance by single lead VDD pacemaker: evaluation using cardiopulmonary exercise test.
    Ijiri H, Komori S, Kohno I, Sano S, Yin D, Takusagawa M, Iida T, Yamamoto K, Osada M, Sawanobori T, Ishihara T, Umetani K, Tamura K.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep 01; 23(9):1336-42. PubMed ID: 11025888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Initial clinical experience with a single pass VDDR pacing system.
    Lau CP, Tai YT, Li JP, Chung FL, Sung S, Yamamoto A.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov 01; 15(11 Pt 2):1894-900. PubMed ID: 1279567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
    Maity AK, Ghosh SP, Dasbiswas A, Chatterjee SS, Chaudhury D, Das MK.
    Indian Heart J; 1992 Nov 01; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.
    Oldroyd KG, Rae AP, Carter R, Wingate C, Cobbe SM.
    Br Heart J; 1991 Apr 01; 65(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 1827588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A double-blind study of submaximal exercise tolerance and variation in paced rate in atrial synchronous compared to activity sensor modulated ventricular pacing.
    Linde-Edelstam C, Nordlander R, Pehrsson SK, Rydén L.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jun 01; 15(6):905-15. PubMed ID: 1376903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Randomised crossover trial of rate responsive Activitrax and conventional fixed rate ventricular pacing.
    Lipkin DP, Buller N, Frenneaux M, Ludgate L, Lowe T, Webb SC, Krikler DM.
    Br Heart J; 1987 Dec 01; 58(6):613-6. PubMed ID: 3322351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Higher sympathetic nerve activity during ventricular (VVI) than during dual-chamber (DDD) pacing.
    Taylor JA, Morillo CA, Eckberg DL, Ellenbogen KA.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Dec 01; 28(7):1753-8. PubMed ID: 8962562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.