These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

360 related items for PubMed ID: 905909

  • 21. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
    Myllynen L, Karjalainen O.
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
    Parker A, Ueki M.
    N Z Med J; 1986 Jun 11; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
    McCord ML, Stovall TG, Summitt RL, Ling FW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May 11; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The clinician's response to the abnormal smear.
    Gordon H.
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr 11; 8(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 7261528
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as determined by cytology and colposcopic biopsy.
    Bamford PN, Beilby JO, Steele SJ, Vlies R.
    Acta Cytol; 1983 Apr 11; 27(5):482-4. PubMed ID: 6578644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO, Jelen I, Louis F, Kawada CY, Curry SL.
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May 11; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Correlation of colposcopically directed biopsy and conization with histologic diagnosis of cervical lesions.
    Savage EW.
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Dec 11; 15(6):211-3. PubMed ID: 1195261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Combined use of colposcopy and cytology].
    Bajardi F.
    Fortschr Med; 1979 Oct 11; 97(38):1691-5. PubMed ID: 511064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V, Tseng P.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep 11; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Morphometric analysis of dysplasia in cervical cone biopsy specimens in cases with false-negative cytology.
    Hartman B, Kaplan B, Boone D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec 11; 68(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 3785796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Clinical efficacy of a new method for LEEP conization with pistol-shaped electroknife].
    Kovachev S, Nacheva A, Atanassova V, Piperkova N, Kostov I, Vasilev N.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010 Dec 11; 49(5):20-5. PubMed ID: 21268398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Ectocervical scraping and endocervical curettage--an alternative procedure to conization in positive cytology (author's transl)].
    Egger H, Hommel G, Michalzik K.
    Arch Gynecol; 1979 Sep 11; 227(3):249-65. PubMed ID: 496440
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV, Hall JB, McGee JA, Laurent S, Alvarez RD, Partridge EE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug 11; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Necessity of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Moseley KR, Dinh TV, Hannigan EV, Dillard EA, Yandell RB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May 11; 154(5):992-5. PubMed ID: 3706454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cruikshank DP, Kaminsky DB, Ekbladh LE.
    J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec 11; 17(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 1003398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y, Vooijs GP, Gaillard HL, Go DM.
    Acta Cytol; 1987 Dec 11; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A study of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women.
    Yamazaki T, Inaba F, Takeda N, Huruno M, Kamemori T, Kousaka N, Ohta Y, Fukasawa I, Inaba N.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Feb 11; 273(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 16362311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.