These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Psychiatric anamnesis, psychiatric findings and their relevance for legal questions in psychiatric assessment before the social court]. Zeit T, Wiester W. Nervenarzt; 1995 Mar; 66(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 7753244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Forensic psychiatry evaluation of mental competence--from psychopathological case analysis to assessment]. von Oefele K. Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Oct; 58(10):543-6. PubMed ID: 9035785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Competency to stand trial and the seriousness of the charge. Buchanan A. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006 Oct; 34(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17185474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental disorder and crime. Taylor PJ. Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S31-6. PubMed ID: 16575813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The imperious need to create evaluation centers for criminologic expert assessment]. Bénézech M, Auriacombe M, Martin C, Serin N. Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1995 Nov; 153(9):597-600. PubMed ID: 8851965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making. Pitt SE, Brandt JD, Tellefsen C, Janofsky JS, Cohen ME, Bettis ED, Rappeport JR. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997 Nov; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives]. Nedopil N, Müller-Isberner R. Nervenarzt; 1995 Nov; 66(11):793-801. PubMed ID: 8532095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Giorgi-Guarnieri D, Janofsky J, Keram E, Lawsky S, Merideth P, Mossman D, Schwart-Watts D, Scott C, Thompson J, Zonana H, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002 Nov; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature]. Guivarch J, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Glezer D, Chabannes JM. Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Some problems in forensic assessment]. Schlegel J, Amboss M. Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):641-6. PubMed ID: 3237869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain. Meynen G. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013 Nov; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]